2013
DOI: 10.1021/nl402680g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Efficiency Nanostructured Window GaAs Solar Cells

Abstract: Nanostructures have been widely used in solar cells due to their extraordinary optical properties. In most nanostructured cells, high short circuit current has been obtained due to enhanced light absorption. However, most of them suffer from lowered open circuit voltage and fill factor. One of the main challenges is formation of good junction and electrical contact. In particular, nanostructures in GaAs only have shown unsatisfactory performances (below 5% in energy conversion efficiency) which cannot match th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
75
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A nanostructured AR window layer combined with a metal mesa bar contact provides not only the enhanced light absorption of the active layers of the solar cell, but also minimizes their negative impact on the electrical properties, thus achieving 17% energy conversion efficiency for a GaAs solar cell, which is the highest reported efficiency among all III-V nanostructured solar devices. [145] By developing and implementing new device architectures in nanostructured solar cells, there can be significant improvement in light-harvesting by these materials to contribute to the conversion efficiency without accompanying electrical losses. For example, a power conversion efficiency of 13.7% was achieved for a >10 µm thick Si nanostructured solar cell, [144] and recently a record efficiency as high as 22.1% was achieved on 280 µm thick nanostructured Si solar cells using the all-backcontact concept, [9] demonstrating that it is possible to solve the Auger and surface recombination problems in nanostructured solar cells, which gives them real commercial potential.…”
Section: Wwwadvancedsciencenewscommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nanostructured AR window layer combined with a metal mesa bar contact provides not only the enhanced light absorption of the active layers of the solar cell, but also minimizes their negative impact on the electrical properties, thus achieving 17% energy conversion efficiency for a GaAs solar cell, which is the highest reported efficiency among all III-V nanostructured solar devices. [145] By developing and implementing new device architectures in nanostructured solar cells, there can be significant improvement in light-harvesting by these materials to contribute to the conversion efficiency without accompanying electrical losses. For example, a power conversion efficiency of 13.7% was achieved for a >10 µm thick Si nanostructured solar cell, [144] and recently a record efficiency as high as 22.1% was achieved on 280 µm thick nanostructured Si solar cells using the all-backcontact concept, [9] demonstrating that it is possible to solve the Auger and surface recombination problems in nanostructured solar cells, which gives them real commercial potential.…”
Section: Wwwadvancedsciencenewscommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Different designs to enhance the efficiency have also been proposed and reported, such as the use of planer thin absorbers. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In order to increase the efficiency and reduce manufacturing cost by using commonly available materials with routinely achievable quality, it becomes necessary to implement light management structures (e.g., textured surface) [12][13][14] to achieve maximum absorption and minimum non-radiative recombination in a thin absorber. Our recently reported theoretical analysis of different optical designs 5,6,15,16 shows that the use of an ultra-thin (submicron) absorber and a reflective back scattering layer can potentially result in the maximal achievable conversion efficiency for single-junction GaAs solar cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to planar cell architectures, nanopillars can enhance light absorption and improve carrier collection, thereby requiring less material and tolerating lower material quality. [1][2][3][4][5][6] However, increased non-radiative surface recombination associated with their large surface area often compensates performance gains and explains why, as of today, nanopillar solar cells have not yet been able to outperform their planar counterparts. [ 7 ] In contrast to other III-V semiconductors, untreated InP possesses a relatively low surface recombination velocity, [ 8 ] which makes it an ideal material system for large surface-area nanopillar devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%