2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-energy impact testing of agglomerated cork at extremely low and high temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the AC216 cork type, the difference was about 4.93 times larger and equaled 326 J (406 J for −30 °C and 80 J for 100 °C). The lack of temperature sensitivity was also confirmed in [35] on the basis of a CAMEA (cork agglomerates model for energy absorption) model defined as:E(d)=AdBCT where d —specimen deflection (mm), T —specimen temperature (°C), A , B , C —variables (-).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In the case of the AC216 cork type, the difference was about 4.93 times larger and equaled 326 J (406 J for −30 °C and 80 J for 100 °C). The lack of temperature sensitivity was also confirmed in [35] on the basis of a CAMEA (cork agglomerates model for energy absorption) model defined as:E(d)=AdBCT where d —specimen deflection (mm), T —specimen temperature (°C), A , B , C —variables (-).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Therefore, the explanation of this interesting phenomenon is related to the binder (polyurethane glue), impact energy and the binder reinforcement i.e., GNP or GO. First of all the cork material, in comparison to the used polyurethane binder, is a very good heat insulator with small heat capacity [32,33]. Once, during the dynamic test, a sample is impacted by the tup at the kinetic energy of 20.75 J, there are thermal effects observed in the samples—mainly due to its viscoelastic and viscoplastic nature of cork agglomerates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests were performed at room temperature, 40 • C, 60 • C, and 80 • C in order to investigate the influence of temperature on agglomerated cork and PVC flexural performances. The selected temperature range was dictated by the need to analyze the progression of agglomerated cork behavior at different temperatures up to an upper limit at which the mechanical properties of polyurethane binders normally experience a strong reduction [16]. Samples were conditioned for two hours before testing in order to achieve a homogeneous temperature across the whole specimen.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%