1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.54.4385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High energy neutrino production by cosmic ray interactions in the Sun

Abstract: The flux of neutrinos originating from cosmic ray interactions with matter in the Sun has been calculated based on Monte Carlo models for high energy particle interactions. The resulting flux at the Earth (within the Sun's solid angle) is higher than the corresponding one from cosmic ray interactions with the Earth atmosphere. The smallness of the absolute rate, however, precludes it as a practical 'standard candle' for neutrino telescopes and limits neutrino oscillation searches. On the other hand, it facilit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
178
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works that have taken the knee into account have assumed for simplicity that the dominant CR component consists of protons alone, having a spectral change ∆α = 0.3 at E knee . In order to observe the effect of the CR composition on the neutrino fluxes, figure 3 compares the total horizontal atmospheric fluxes (with the prompt charm component calculated with the GBW model) as obtained for different assumptions on the CR spectrum, namely the ∆α = 2/3 rigidity dependent scenario (that corresponds to the results given already in figure 2), the same total CR spectrum but assuming it consists only of protons, and the CR spectrum used in [4,7] (which is assumed to be constituted by protons and has a single spectral index change of ∆α = 0.3 at E knee = 5 × 10 15 eV). The latter CR spectrum has a normalization which is Figure 2: Atmospheric (ν µ +ν µ ) fluxes for the ∆α = 2/3 rigidity dependent scenario (that corresponds to the CR spectrum plotted in figure 1).…”
Section: Neutrino Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Previous works that have taken the knee into account have assumed for simplicity that the dominant CR component consists of protons alone, having a spectral change ∆α = 0.3 at E knee . In order to observe the effect of the CR composition on the neutrino fluxes, figure 3 compares the total horizontal atmospheric fluxes (with the prompt charm component calculated with the GBW model) as obtained for different assumptions on the CR spectrum, namely the ∆α = 2/3 rigidity dependent scenario (that corresponds to the results given already in figure 2), the same total CR spectrum but assuming it consists only of protons, and the CR spectrum used in [4,7] (which is assumed to be constituted by protons and has a single spectral index change of ∆α = 0.3 at E knee = 5 × 10 15 eV). The latter CR spectrum has a normalization which is Figure 2: Atmospheric (ν µ +ν µ ) fluxes for the ∆α = 2/3 rigidity dependent scenario (that corresponds to the CR spectrum plotted in figure 1).…”
Section: Neutrino Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong suppression of the ν flux produced by the heavier components implies that the light (H and He) components are still responsible for a large fraction of the neutrinos above their knee, and hence the change in slope of the individual components is also reflected in the change in slope of the neutrino fluxes. Figure 3: Comparison of the total horizontal atmospheric (ν µ +ν µ ) flux for prompt charm/GBW produced by CRs under different assumptions concerning spectrum and composition: the ∆α = 2/3 rigidity dependent scenario that considers the contribution of CR components with charge 1 ≤ Z ≤ 28; the same total CR spectrum but assuming it consists only of protons; and the CR spectrum used in [4,7] (TIG), which also takes only protons into account but has a lower normalization.…”
Section: Neutrino Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations