2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-020-00834-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-energy quasiparticle injection into mesoscopic superconductors

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
77
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
11
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ritter et al 16 ascribe the critical current quenching observed in titanium nitride nanowires to the injection of energetic electrons from the gate electrodes to the superconductor, which trigger the formation of a large number of quasiparticles that drive the nanowire back to the normal state. Alegria et al 17 and Golokolenov et al 18 support similar arguments to account for the behavior observed in electron tunneling spectroscopy experiments in titanium nanowires and in a vanadium waveguide resonator, respectively. On the other hand, Mercaldo et al 19 propose a theoretical model based on electric-field induced spin-orbit polarization at the surface, capable of modulating the phase and amplitude of the superconducting order parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Ritter et al 16 ascribe the critical current quenching observed in titanium nitride nanowires to the injection of energetic electrons from the gate electrodes to the superconductor, which trigger the formation of a large number of quasiparticles that drive the nanowire back to the normal state. Alegria et al 17 and Golokolenov et al 18 support similar arguments to account for the behavior observed in electron tunneling spectroscopy experiments in titanium nanowires and in a vanadium waveguide resonator, respectively. On the other hand, Mercaldo et al 19 propose a theoretical model based on electric-field induced spin-orbit polarization at the surface, capable of modulating the phase and amplitude of the superconducting order parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In previous studies, the origin of GCS was attributed to two different mechanisms, either to the effect of the applied electric field 12 21 , 25 − 28 or to high-energy quasiparticle injection via tunneling. 22 24 We will compare our experimental findings with these explanations in the following.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The former results are in opposition with previous experiments [2-4] on the subject. We attribute this different behavior to the reduction in thermal coupling between the Dayem bridge and substrate compared to systems located on a substrate, whereas in terms of the microscopic origin of the gate-driven effect, the reduction in the switching current appears to be connected to a considerable increase in quasi-particle excitations in the superconducting system [21,23]. Such enhancements seem to be more efficient in suspended devices, in which the relaxation of quasiparticles via electron-phonon interactions is greatly reduced compared to conventional systems.…”
Section: Suspended Titanium Gate-controlled Transistormentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Figure 3b shows bilateral suppression of the supercurrent down to total quenching for |V G | 10 V in a range of bath temperature from 2 to 3.2 K. Notably, the sharper suppression of I S observed for positive values of the gate voltage is in contrast with a possible cold field-emission origin of the quenching effect. Indeed, the device geometry could facilitate electron extraction from the gate that occurs at negative gate bias values [21,22]. This consideration is deeply discussed in Section 3.…”
Section: Vanadium Gate-controlled Transistormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation