2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c02072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Energy Storage Density of Sandwich-Structured Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3/PVDF Nanocomposites Enhanced by Optimizing the Dimensions of Fillers

Abstract: The dielectric behavior and mechanisms of improved energy storage density of sandwich-structured different dimensions of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 /PVDF composites were studied. Compared with NBT-NPs/PVDF, optimized NBT-NFs/PVDF has a greater dielectric polarization strength, so the dielectric constant of NBT-NFs/PVDF is greater than that of composite materials filled with NBT-NPs with the same volume content. With the benefit from the addition of optimized high-aspect-ratio one-dimension NBT fiber as filler and the sand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 8 shows a comparison of the energy storage densities and efficiencies of inorganic ller/polymer matrix composites researched in recent years; 21,22,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] the specic data are shown in Table S1. † In this work, 0.5 vol% PLZST/P(VDF-HFP) lm has extremely high U e and h values compared to other inorganic ller/polymer matrix composites.…”
Section: Energy Storage Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 8 shows a comparison of the energy storage densities and efficiencies of inorganic ller/polymer matrix composites researched in recent years; 21,22,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] the specic data are shown in Table S1. † In this work, 0.5 vol% PLZST/P(VDF-HFP) lm has extremely high U e and h values compared to other inorganic ller/polymer matrix composites.…”
Section: Energy Storage Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, at 350 kV mm −1 , the U e value of NBT-NFS/PVDF nanocomposites reached 11.7 J cm −3 . 21 Furthermore, an optimized BT/PVDF nanocomposite acquired an ultra-high U e value of 16.2 J cm −3 at 410 MV m −1 . 22 In addition, lead-based antiferroelectric ceramics show the characteristics of a remarkable dielectric constant, remarkable polarization, low hysteresis, and low loss, showing preeminent energy storage characteristics; 23,24 hence, they can also be used as nanofillers and compounded with polymers to obtain nanocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charge-discharge efficiency and discharged energy density of the PVDF-390 film are compared with those of pristine PVDF films in other recently published works [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] in Fig. 13, showing that the PVDF film irradiated with 390 kGy outperforms those other pristine PVDF films.…”
Section: Energy Storage Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are two main patterns of the sandwich structure. The first one is to use a high-dielectric layer (soft layer) as the outer layer and a high breakdown layer (hard layer) as the middle layer, 14,[16][17][18][19][20] and the other one is on the contrary. 15,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Shen et al 29 compared the two reversed structures, namely GBG and BGB, where G-layers (soft layers) were PVDF with graphene oxide nanosheets coated with TiO 2 nanoparticles (GO-TiO 2 ), and B-layers (hard layers) were PVDF with Ba 0.6 Sr 0.4 TiO 3 (BST) nanofibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%