2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0gc01066a
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High enhancement of the hydrolysis rate of cellulose after pretreatment with inorganic salt hydrates

Abstract: Cellulose treatment dissolution/precipitation in inorganic salt hydrates produces a dramatic morphology change that yields a reactivity improvement respect the untreated for transformations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All samples were mounted on the same sample holder with the scanning range from 2θ = 10 to 60° at a sweep speed of 10° min –1 . The crystallinity index (CrI) of cellulose samples was estimated according to Segal’s method , CrI = I 200 I am I 200 where I 200 is the maximum intensity of the principal peak (200) lattice diffraction (at 22.9 for cellulose I, 21.8 for cellulose II, and 20.2 for amorphous cellulose), and I am of cellulose I and cellulose II were the minimum intensity between planar reflections (110)/(200) and (1–10)/(110), respectively (at 18° for cellulose I, at 16° for cellulose II). In order to distinguish the distinct types of crystalline cellulose and disordered cellulose, the solid-state NMR experiments of cellulose and regenerated cellulose structure were performed on a Bruker AVANCE NEO 400 WB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples were mounted on the same sample holder with the scanning range from 2θ = 10 to 60° at a sweep speed of 10° min –1 . The crystallinity index (CrI) of cellulose samples was estimated according to Segal’s method , CrI = I 200 I am I 200 where I 200 is the maximum intensity of the principal peak (200) lattice diffraction (at 22.9 for cellulose I, 21.8 for cellulose II, and 20.2 for amorphous cellulose), and I am of cellulose I and cellulose II were the minimum intensity between planar reflections (110)/(200) and (1–10)/(110), respectively (at 18° for cellulose I, at 16° for cellulose II). In order to distinguish the distinct types of crystalline cellulose and disordered cellulose, the solid-state NMR experiments of cellulose and regenerated cellulose structure were performed on a Bruker AVANCE NEO 400 WB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ZnBr 2 •4H 2 O was investigated in the hydrolysis of cellulose to sugars (e.g., glucose), exhibiting the best performance such as a conversion of 88%, a yield of 80%, and a selectivity of 91%. 31 Moreover, after the 2 nd cyclic test using recovered ZnBr 2 •4H 2 O, the recovery efficiency of ZnBr 2 •4H 2 O, the conversion of cellulose, and the yield and selectivity of glucose were not obviously decreased, 31 indicating that ZnBr 2 •4H 2 O makes this technical route promising and practical for large-scale applications.…”
Section: Msmtc Of Biomass Into Chemicals and Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was due apart from chlorophyll, other components in the leaves could also bind to Zn. These components include phenolic components [23]- [26], flavonoids [27], cellulose [28], [29], and proteins [30]. The sambiloto simplicia powder formed a metallochlorophyll complex, which was less efficient than the extract due to competition in the binding of Zn 2+ .…”
Section: Bound Zn Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%