2012
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High enzyme activity UGT1A1 or low activity UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes increase esophageal cancer risk

Abstract: Abstract. Esophageal cancer (EC) has a globally increasing incidence with poor curative treatment options and survival rates. Environmental and dietary factors have crucial roles in esophageal carcinogenesis. Polymorphisms in the UGT genes, a superfamily of enzymes essential for the detoxification of carcinogens, may alter enzyme activity and subsequently may play a role in EC etiology. Rather than solely establishing differences in genotype distribution, we investigated whether functional polymorphisms in UGT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, the polymorphic variants of UGT1A8 at codons 173 and 277 have been associated with altered glucuronidation activity (48) and cancer risk (49). A functional effect by these variants was also observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, the polymorphic variants of UGT1A8 at codons 173 and 277 have been associated with altered glucuronidation activity (48) and cancer risk (49). A functional effect by these variants was also observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UGT2B4 genotypes associated with decreased enzyme activities are found to increase the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [43].…”
Section: Discovering Rare Driver Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only patients with a diagnosis of esophageal carcinoma, as confirmed by a pathologist, were included in the study. Tissue, blood and DNA were stored, and DNA isolation was performed as previously described [11]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%