2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10680-008-9163-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Fertility in City Suburbs: Compositional or Contextual Effects?

Abstract: Fertility rates are known to be higher in city suburbs. One interpretation is that the suburban 'context' influences the behaviour of individuals who reside there while an alternative is that the 'composition' of the suburban population explains the higher fertility levels. Furthermore, suburban in-migrants who intend to have children may have a significant influence on suburban fertility rates. Using Finnish longitudinal register data we show that fertility rates are higher in the suburbs and rural areas and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
58
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the effect of selective residential moves on suburban fertility may not be as large as we think. Our recent study using longitudinal data from Finland shows that couples who moved from urban centres to surrounding suburbs indeed had elevated fertility levels after moving, thus supporting the idea of selective residential moves (Kulu and Boyle 2009). Interestingly, however, fertility levels in the suburbs were not much influenced by selective moves as the 'migrant' couples only formed a small share of the total suburban population in the Finnish context; more people had grown up in the suburbs or had moved there before they formed a union.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, the effect of selective residential moves on suburban fertility may not be as large as we think. Our recent study using longitudinal data from Finland shows that couples who moved from urban centres to surrounding suburbs indeed had elevated fertility levels after moving, thus supporting the idea of selective residential moves (Kulu and Boyle 2009). Interestingly, however, fertility levels in the suburbs were not much influenced by selective moves as the 'migrant' couples only formed a small share of the total suburban population in the Finnish context; more people had grown up in the suburbs or had moved there before they formed a union.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This shift in the timing of home ownership and moving into a single-family home need not surprise us: the time between partnership formation and parenthood has increased on average, dual earnership has become common particularly among couples without children, and in these birth cohorts home ownership increased along with increasing prosperity. The move into owner-occupation (Mulder and Wagner 2001) or into a single-family home ) is frequently followed quickly by the birth of a child, and fertility is higher in less urban than urban environments (Kulu and Boyle 2009;Kulu, Vikat, and Andersson 2007). These findings suggest that many couples move to better housing in anticipation of having children (see also Kulu 2008;Michielin and Mulder 2008); more generally, many couples who have a child move around childbirth (Clark and Davies Withers 2009).…”
Section: Recent Empirical Findings: Parenthood and Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences in union dissolution by place of residence would need more attention in the field of divorce studies (cf. Kulu and Boyle 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%