2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2009.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High fidelity computational simulation of a membrane wing airfoil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At stall angles of α 25 deg, the structural response gets more energized, and the dominant frequency drops back to St 0.7. Low-frequency vortex shedding excites the membrane structure at low mode shapes and results in energy content for low frequencies [13]. The lower AR 1 wing (Fig.…”
Section: Results: Aerodynamic Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At stall angles of α 25 deg, the structural response gets more energized, and the dominant frequency drops back to St 0.7. Low-frequency vortex shedding excites the membrane structure at low mode shapes and results in energy content for low frequencies [13]. The lower AR 1 wing (Fig.…”
Section: Results: Aerodynamic Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rigid wings show aerodynamic benefits within a camber range of 3 to 4% [10,11]. For larger camber values, flexible membrane wings offer larger benefits than similar shaped rigid cambered wings due to their inherent shape adaptability [12,13]. Flexible membrane wings interact with the shear layer, energizing it and causing it to remain close to the wing surface [12].…”
Section: Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static deformation affects the airfoil camber and tip wash-out advantageously by altering the aerodynamic and geometric twist distribution on the wing [18][19][20][21]. The dynamic deformation, or membrane vibration, interacts with the separated shear layer, increasing the momentum transfer and reducing the flow separation [21,22]. Because advantageous properties of the membrane wing appear to be related to both static and dynamic deformation, research interest in the interaction of membrane dynamics and unsteady flow structure surrounding the wing has recently intensified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater the velocity smaller will be the value of the aeroelastic parameter. Flexibility creates oscillation and when Reynolds number increases, aeroelastic parameter will decrease which will shift the shear layer close to wing surface while the camber will increase (Gordnier, 2009). value of thickness which is 0.4mm & 1mm respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rigid tips behaviour Graph between L/D vs angle of attack At a fixed value of aeroelastic parameter, significant decrease in the size of the separation zone is seen (Gordnier, 2009). For flexible curved tip, the value of aeroelastic parameter is around 148.2 while it is 201.1 for flexible flat tip.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%