2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.240503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Fidelity, High-Scalability Two-Qubit Gate Scheme for Superconducting Qubits

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the full range of indium bump height expected from the bonding process, the predicted maximum achievable fidelity (taken as the minimum of the coherence-limited and unitary fidelity) varies from just under 99.0-99.5%. For an initial proof of concept, this range is acceptable; however, to push toward fidelities exceeding 99% or to employ this as part of a tunable coupler scheme 41,42 , efforts will be needed to reduce the spread. Additional calibration of the force applied during the bonding process and design revisions to reduce the sensitivity of the coupling to bump height by changing the paddle geometry could reduce this variation further for gate schemes requiring a tighter tolerance.…”
Section: Device Fabrication Assembly and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the full range of indium bump height expected from the bonding process, the predicted maximum achievable fidelity (taken as the minimum of the coherence-limited and unitary fidelity) varies from just under 99.0-99.5%. For an initial proof of concept, this range is acceptable; however, to push toward fidelities exceeding 99% or to employ this as part of a tunable coupler scheme 41,42 , efforts will be needed to reduce the spread. Additional calibration of the force applied during the bonding process and design revisions to reduce the sensitivity of the coupling to bump height by changing the paddle geometry could reduce this variation further for gate schemes requiring a tighter tolerance.…”
Section: Device Fabrication Assembly and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this tunability is usually achieved at the cost of introducing additional decoherence or circuit complexity. [ 70–76 ] Alternatively, parametric modulation of qubits' frequencies can be used to realize this tunability [ 77–79 ] without coupling devices, and thus simplifies the circuit.…”
Section: Parametric Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 73 ] Alternatively, the cross‐Kerr ZZ‐interaction can be obtained for two qubits with large qubit‐frequency difference, and, in this case, controlled‐phase gates can be implemented. [ 74,75 ] As the total interaction is adjusted from large detuned qubit‐coupler interaction, the unwanted qubit interactions can also be completely turned off, and thus high‐fidelity quantum operations can be possible.…”
Section: Parametric Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on two-qubit circuits over the Clifford+CS gate set, which consists of the Clifford gates together with the non-Clifford controlled-phase gate CS = diag(1, 1, 1, i). The CS gate has received recent attention as an alternative to the T-gate in methods for fault-tolerant quantum computing 30,31 and due to its natural implementation as an entangling operation in certain superconducting qubit systems [32][33][34][35] whose fidelity is approaching that of single-qubit gates 36,37 . Our algorithm produces an optimal circuit in a number of arithmetic operations linear in the length of the optimal decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%