2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High flux and fouling resistant flat sheet polyethersulfone membranes incorporated with graphene oxide for ultrafiltration applications

Abstract: Highlights1. PES/GO membranes were prepared in combination with various pore forming agents.2. Higher flux and improved rejection were achieved with the addition of GO.3. Synthetic solutions of protein and dyes were rejected efficiently at 1 bar. 4. Membrane fouling was reduced with the addition of GO.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in practical applications, the traditional NF membrane does not simultaneously provide good chemical stability, microbial resistance, and high mechanical strength. Recently, some studies on the use of nanomaterials for membrane modification have generated great interest, such as carbon nanotube [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], graphene oxide [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] and molybdenum disulfide [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practical applications, the traditional NF membrane does not simultaneously provide good chemical stability, microbial resistance, and high mechanical strength. Recently, some studies on the use of nanomaterials for membrane modification have generated great interest, such as carbon nanotube [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], graphene oxide [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] and molybdenum disulfide [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be observed, compared to the neat PVDF membrane (M 1 ) with porosity of about 61.5%, all the prepared membranes (M 2 –M 8 ) have higher porosity in the range of 66.2%–80.6%. It can be explained that the hydrophilicity effect of GONRs and PVP improves the casting solution thermodynamic instability, which during the phase inversion process causes the rapid mass transfer between the non‐solvent and solvent and greatly promotes the influx of non‐solvent upon immersion in the bath of coagulation leading to the formation of larger pores and higher overall porosity and consequently the formation of a typical asymmetric porous finger‐like structure as shown in Figure 9 90,98–100 . Also, as can be observed Table 2, the mean pore size and porosity of the PVDF/1GONRs/PVP (M 8 ) nanocomposite membrane decrease due to increased viscosity of the casting solution which delays phase inversion demixing 101,102 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The DR t was calculated according to Equation (4), which can be subdivided into two components DR r and DR ir . DR r was calculated according to Equation (5), and it referred to the flux decline that could be easily recovered, which was mainly caused by reversible foulants deposition. Instead, DR ir was caused by foulants blocked in the pores of membrane, which was hardly recovered, and was calculated according to Equation (6).…”
Section: Antifouling Property Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrafiltration (UF), as a sustainable cost-effective low-pressure wastewater treatment technology, yielding good removal of turbidity and microbes, has been extensively applied in water purification and reclamation [1][2][3][4]. However, membrane fouling, particularly biological fouling and organic fouling, begins, once the membrane is exposed to a complex watery environment [5][6][7]. Moreover, many issues (decrease in filtration efficiency, increase in the energy consumption, deterioration in water quality, acceleration in membrane aging, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%