ABSTRACThaematologica | 2010; 95(4) 679
© F e r r a t a S t o r t i F o u n d a t i o n
Design and Methods
Patient samplesBone marrow aspirates were available from 48 children presenting with acute lymphoblastic leukemia at the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK who were entered into the UKALL2003 clinical trial. Samples were taken from excess material leftover from diagnostic or staging bone marrow aspirates and ethical approval for the study was obtained (reference numbers 2002/111 and 07/H0906). Cytogenetic analysis was carried out on diagnostic bone marrow using standard procedures and FISH was performed for the presence of TEL/AML1, BCR-ABL fusions and MLL gene rearrangements. Patients were classified into 3 major cytogenetic subgroups: TEL/AML1 positive, High Hyperdiploidy, and Other. There was one patient with a BCR-ABL rearrangement. Four bone marrow aspirates, taken from children in continuous remission at the end of treatment (more than 2-3 years following diagnosis) served as normal comparison samples.
Flow cytometryFlow cytometric analyses for the detection of MRD were performed as described previously.11 Day 28 samples were considered positive if MRD was detectable at greater than or equal to 0.01%. In this study, we retrospectively interrogated flow cytometric data from diagnostic (50,000 events) and day 28 follow-up samples (500,000 events) for the CD34 + CD38 Low CD19 + population. Samples were considered positive if at least 50 CD34 + CD38 Low CD19+ events were visible. Diagnostic samples were also assessed for CD38 expression relative to normal B-cell progenitors, i.e. CD10
Results and DiscussionThe proposed candidate LSC population is found at varying frequencies across different cytogenetic subgroupsGiven that a cell population, defined by CD34 + CD38 Low CD19 + expression, has recently been reported to show cancer stem cell activity in TEL/AML1 ALL, 10 we sought this population in diagnostic samples from children with ALL (n=48) using multiparameter flow cytometry ( Figure 1A). The cohort included the two major good risk cytogenetic groups, TEL/AML1 (n=10) and High Hyperdiploid (n=8), and also a heterogeneous group consisting of rare or no apparent cytogenetic abnormalities, which were classified as Other (n=30). The CD34 + CD38 Low
CD19+ population was detectable at 0.1% or higher in 60% of our patient cohort (n=29) with the level of the population varying from 0.2-80.3% (median, 5.6%), as a proportion of the total leukemic blasts. In the remaining 40% of patients (n=19), the CD34 + CD38 Low CD19+ population was either absent or below the limit of detection. The incidence of the candidate LSC population varied between cytogenetic subgroups ( Figure 1B
© F e r r a t a S t o r t i F o u n d a t i o nacross cytogenetic subgroups ( Figure 2B). For TEL/AML1 cases, 90% showed underexpression (n=9) and 10% showed overlap of CD38 expression (n=1) and for the high hyperdiploid patients, 63% (n=5) were classified with CD38 underexpression and 37% (n=3) + population would need to be ...