2006
DOI: 10.1093/ijl/eck007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-frequency Grammatical Lexis in Advanced-level English Learners' Dictionaries: from Language Description to Pedagogical Usefulness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of inaccuracy seems to be intensified by the controlled defining vocabulary in learner's dictionaries and children's dictionaries (Feng 2009: 153-154). Furthermore, the lexicographic treatment of words expressing abstract relations, such as that of prepositions, is still unsatisfactory in many dictionaries (Coffey 2006;Lew 2010). Such problems often seem unavoidable.…”
Section: Limitations Of Verbal Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of inaccuracy seems to be intensified by the controlled defining vocabulary in learner's dictionaries and children's dictionaries (Feng 2009: 153-154). Furthermore, the lexicographic treatment of words expressing abstract relations, such as that of prepositions, is still unsatisfactory in many dictionaries (Coffey 2006;Lew 2010). Such problems often seem unavoidable.…”
Section: Limitations Of Verbal Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the kinds of words whose lexicographic treatment even in the leading dictionaries still leaves one dissatisfied (Coffey 2006). Adamska-Saล‚aciak (2008) advocates the inclusion of schematic graphs to represent the meaning of prepositions, and an example for the prepositions above, over, under and below is given in Figure 2.…”
Section: Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one thing, the early study of microstructure laid emphasis on the comparative paradigm, mainly with regarding to the grammatical information (Lemmens & Wekker, 1991), representation validity (Bogaards,1996) and labelling status (Dziemianko, 2011). For another, the comparative research and quantitative analysis of Big Five have optimized the dictionary compilation and representation, like quantitative study about deictic words (Xu, 2005) and other research on high-frequency grammatical marker (Coffey, 2006). Besides, collocation is also the emphasis of comparative research in learner's dictionary (Walker, 2009;Dziemianko, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%