High-Frequency, Low-Dose Education to Improve Neonatal Outcomes in Low-Resource Settings

Abstract

Background: Annually 2.5 million infants die in the first 28 days of life, with a significant regional distribution disparity. An estimated 80% of those could be saved if neonatal resuscitation were correctly and promptly initiated. A barrier to achieving the target is the knowledge and skills of healthcare workers. Purpose: The objective of this cluster randomized trial was to assess the improvement and retention of resuscitation skills of nurses, midwives, and birth attendants in 2 birth centers serving 60 villages in rural India using high-frequency, low-dose training. Results: There was a significant difference (P < .05) between the groups in the rate of resuscitation, with 18% needing resuscitation in the control group and 6% in the intervention group. The posttest scores for knowledge retention at the final 8-month evaluation were significantly better in the intervention group than in the control group (intervention group mean rank 19.4 vs control group mean rank 10.3; P < .05). The success rate of resuscitation was not significantly different among the groups. Implications for Practice: Improved knowledge retention at 8 months and the lower need for resuscitation in the intervention group support the efficacy of the high-frequency, low-dose education model of teaching in this setting. Implications for Research: Replication of these findings in other settings with a larger population cohort is needed to study the impact of such intervention on birth outcomes in low-resource settings.

Nongovernmental Organization Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Challenges and Solutions to Changing Handwashing Behavior in Older Children: A Qualitative Study

“…64,[66][67][68][69] Although these recommendations seem contradictory, the potential for low-dose, high-frequency interventions has been explored in various aspects of public health programming and may be a potential innovation to bring to HWWS promotion generally and to HWWS interventions targeting older children specifically. [70][71][72][73] Although evidence suggests that a combination of hardware and software is necessary for behavior change, 59,64,74 in resource-scarce settings, it may prove more challenging to meet both of the previously mentioned recommendations with software-heavy interventions, which rely on human resources. Interventions that involve repeated exposure to low-resource hardware without requiring many human resources could more feasibly meet both recommendations.…”

“… 64 , 66 – 69 Although these recommendations seem contradictory, the potential for low-dose, high-frequency interventions has been explored in various aspects of public health programming and may be a potential innovation to bring to HWWS promotion generally and to HWWS interventions targeting older children specifically. 70 – 73 …”