1981
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.24.1436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-gain, free-electron laser amplifiers: Design considerations and simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus important to maintain a sufficiently large microbunching throughout the tapered region as this increases the refractive index of the electron beam and boosts the coherent interaction between the electrons and the radiation [15]. It is useful at this point to consider the trapping function F t ðzÞ which determines the fraction of electrons trapped in the FEL bucket along the tapered undulator:…”
Section: Tapering Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus important to maintain a sufficiently large microbunching throughout the tapered region as this increases the refractive index of the electron beam and boosts the coherent interaction between the electrons and the radiation [15]. It is useful at this point to consider the trapping function F t ðzÞ which determines the fraction of electrons trapped in the FEL bucket along the tapered undulator:…”
Section: Tapering Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sources include traveling wave tubes and free electron lasers (FELs) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. The degree to which an electron beam can be bunched is a strong function of the beam quality.…”
Section: Methods For Conditioning Electron Beams In Free Electron Lasersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROMETEO is a 1D, multiparticle code [36] based on a modified version of the Prosnitz, Szoke, and Neil formulation of the FEL dynamical equations [37,38]. The original model has been generalized to include the effect of beam emittance and the undulator errors.…”
Section: Prometeomentioning
confidence: 99%