“…A comparative study of the proposed antenna and reported antennas for 0.5–6 GHz applications in terms of antenna size, resonating frequency, bandwidth, and antenna gain is presented in Table 5. It is clearly visualized from the perusal Table 5 that the proposed antenna (840.96 mm 2 ) is more compact as compared to reported antennas 17–24 in Table 5. The proposed antenna has smaller patch area (840.96 mm 2 ) as compared to antennas (2380), 17 (2826), 18 (1800), 19 (5775), 20 (2451), 21 (2500), 22 (2250), 23 and (2250 mm 2 ) 24 with the factor of 2.83, 3.36, 2.14, 6.86, 2.91, 2.97, 2.67, and 2.67, respectively.…”