Studies of adaptation and speciation have greatly benefited from rapid progress of DNA sequencing and genotyping technologies. Comparative genomics of closely related taxa has great potential to advance evolutionary research on genetic architecture of adaptive traits and reproductive isolation. Such studies that utilized closely related plant species and ecotypes have already provided some important insights into genomic regions and/or genes that are potentially involved in local adaptation and speciation. The choice of an appropriate species model for such research is crucial. The paper discusses current approaches used to reveal the patterns of intra-and interspecific divergence due to natural selection. Its outcomes in herbaceous plants and forest trees are briefly summarized and compared to reveal general regularities concerning evolutionary processes. We then highlight the importance of multispecies studies and discuss the utility of several related pine taxa as fine candidates for evolutionary inferences. Genetically similar but ecologically and phenotypically diverged taxa seem a promising study system to search for genomic patterns of speciation and adaptive variation.Key words: adaptation, divergence, genetic variation, natural selection, Pinus mugo, P. sylvestris.Local adaptation to different selective regimes (i.e., water availability, soil type, photoperiod and temperature) may result in various ecotypes, exhibiting phenotypic differences under specific environmental conditions. The emergence of ecotypes might be an outcome of a number of factors including, e.g., limited migration, density dependent viability and environmental boundaries, and selection on phenotypic plasticity (de Jong, 2005). Adaptation may even lead to ecological speciation, causing reproductive isolation between populations previously connected by gene flow (Rundle & Nosil, 2005). Currently, many closely related plant species are distinguished on the basis of their morphology, but genetic divergence responsible for the observed diversity is usually poorly understood. The relationship between a genotype and phenotype in trees is known even less than in other plant species. The main reason behind this situation is that the forest tree research community is indeed incomparably smaller than the group that studies other plant species such as Arabidopsis thaliana or crops. Also, the research is predominantly focused on a few temperate species of high economic value, whereas tree species of ecological importance are commonly ignored (Neale & Kremer, 2011). Although studies of local adaptation in trees have a long tradition of common-garden experiments (provenance trials), such research gives primarily phenotypic information but cannot identify particular genes involved in adaptation (Gonz alezMart ınez et al., 2006). Furthermore, trees have large population size and long generation time which make them challenging to study. Most tree genomes are large and therefore costly to sequence. The genomics of adaptation in trees is thus ...