1986
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860701)58:1<190::aid-cncr2820580133>3.0.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities

Abstract: From July 1975 to December 1982, 358 patients were referred to the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) with the diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. Two hundred eleven of these patients presented with resectable, localized high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas and have been included in the present analysis of the management and outcome of patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity treated at the NCI. One hundred forty-seven of these 211 patients have been include… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
70
1
6

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
70
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…ILP with consecutive limb-sparing surgery is considered the alternative for amputation in this study population. This is based on the insight that limbpreserving surgery is equal to amputation in terms of survival, [2][3][4] although the local recurrence rate of 10% to 20% 26 -28 after limb-sparing resection is obviously higher than when an amputation is performed. There is still debate as to whether local recurrence of STS is a determinant of overall survival, with studies that do not find a statistically significant effect, 2,29 and studies that do.…”
Section: Progression and Survivalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…ILP with consecutive limb-sparing surgery is considered the alternative for amputation in this study population. This is based on the insight that limbpreserving surgery is equal to amputation in terms of survival, [2][3][4] although the local recurrence rate of 10% to 20% 26 -28 after limb-sparing resection is obviously higher than when an amputation is performed. There is still debate as to whether local recurrence of STS is a determinant of overall survival, with studies that do not find a statistically significant effect, 2,29 and studies that do.…”
Section: Progression and Survivalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Following from this, the question of the prognostic role of local recurrence arises. In this study, the occurrence of local recurrence was associated with an increased risk of death, as shown in several studies [2,13,10,19], while others show no association between local recurrence and overall survival [9,21,22]. As to the cause of the increased risk we can merely hypothesize between a direct effect of local recurrence on survival and an indirect effect with local recurrence as a marker of high biological tumour aggressiveness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Systemic spread seems to be an early event in STS. Amputation of extremity tumors compared to limb sparing procedures did not result in improved survival rates 10. Surgical resection of metachronous lung metastases is always considered in the case of limited disease and longer interval since primary surgery as it has been associated with long‐term survival 11, 12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%