2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2019.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High heat flux limits of the fusion reactor water-cooled first wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, heat loads will be more demanding in future commercial fusion reactors. Thus, power requirements are expected to increase [42] as faster flows would be needed to avoid overheating of LMs. If higher flow speeds during operation are desired, not only power requirements would increase, but attempting to thrust a flow with j × B-thrust could generate the same instabilities described in section 3.2.…”
Section: Power Requirements For the Implementation Of J × Bthrustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, heat loads will be more demanding in future commercial fusion reactors. Thus, power requirements are expected to increase [42] as faster flows would be needed to avoid overheating of LMs. If higher flow speeds during operation are desired, not only power requirements would increase, but attempting to thrust a flow with j × B-thrust could generate the same instabilities described in section 3.2.…”
Section: Power Requirements For the Implementation Of J × Bthrustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is evident from these overplots, an SHPD device with major radius approximately 1/3 to 1/2 the major radius of an FPP will tend to have lower pressure and edge parallel heat flux and higher surface-average heat flux than an FPP. High core radiation fraction will likely be relied upon to reduce the divertor heat load, and given the challenges of managing steady-state firstwall heat fluxes exceeding 0.75-2 MW m −2 [49,50], lower-A and larger-R SHPD device configurations are better suited to matching FPP P heat /S values. Further, as discussed in section 2, FPP studies indicate that exploring aspect ratio range A = 1.9 to 2.3 could inform any potential confinement benefit or disadvantage relative to the Petty08 and/or ITER 98y2 projected confinement.…”
Section: Systems Studies Analysis For Shpdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is instead thought to assess the technical and economic benefits of a continuous hydrogen production from fusion electricity, in contrast to the uneven hydrogen production from over generation events. The option of hydrogen production from nuclear fusion heat is not considered here because of the temperatures required for the chemical process to happen (around 900°C in the sulphur-iodine cycle [21]), well above those of the coolants in fusion power plants (300-500°C) [22] that are indeed limited by technical requirements of the structural materials [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%