2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-011-1317-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High hyperdiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults shows clonal heterogeneity and chromosomal instability at diagnosis and during the course of the disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies have reported contradictory data on the presence of clonal heterogeneity in HHD‐B‐ALL which depend on the methodology of analysis used [9,23,25,41]. Consistent with our data, clonal heterogeneity was observed by iFISH [23–25], spectral‐karyotyping [42], single‐cell next‐generation sequencing [43] and by cell division studies directly assessing chromosome segregation in primary leukemic blasts [21]. Our results reinforce that conventional karyotyping fails to reflect the actual clonal heterogeneity in HHD‐B‐ALL patients, suggesting that clonal selection seen in conventional karyotyping analysis likely arises from the cell culture needed for karyotyping, which may mask the actual clonal composition of HHD‐B‐ALL samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier studies have reported contradictory data on the presence of clonal heterogeneity in HHD‐B‐ALL which depend on the methodology of analysis used [9,23,25,41]. Consistent with our data, clonal heterogeneity was observed by iFISH [23–25], spectral‐karyotyping [42], single‐cell next‐generation sequencing [43] and by cell division studies directly assessing chromosome segregation in primary leukemic blasts [21]. Our results reinforce that conventional karyotyping fails to reflect the actual clonal heterogeneity in HHD‐B‐ALL patients, suggesting that clonal selection seen in conventional karyotyping analysis likely arises from the cell culture needed for karyotyping, which may mask the actual clonal composition of HHD‐B‐ALL samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, fluorescence in situ hybridization on interphase nuclei (iFISH) in combination with conventional cytogenetics has proved to be useful for the accurate detection of chromosomal gains, as iFISH does not require dividing cells and it can detect hidden clones and mosaicism within the samples [ 22 ]. Indeed, the use of iFISH by independent groups has revealed high levels of clonal heterogeneity in HHD‐B‐ALL samples [ 23 , 24 , 25 ], with multiple subclones containing different combinations of chromosomal gains in individual cells, suggesting chromosomal instability (CIN) within HHD‐B‐ALL. Notably, sequential iFISH analysis (seq‐iFISH), which permits identification of the eight typically gained chromosomes in HHD‐B‐ALL, showed changes in chromosome number to be hierarchical with sequential chromosomal gains, rather than losses, retained from lower to higher MNs [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 These data support previous studies showing the presence of cytogenetically different subclones in HyperD-ALL. [58][59][60][61] Mechanistically, HyperD-ALL primary blasts and cell lines did not show abnormalities in bipolar spindle and kinetochore formation. However, they displayed important chromosome-structure and -function defects, a major mechanism regulating chromosome segregation that is essential for maintaining the genomic integrity of cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%