2016
DOI: 10.1111/fme.12194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High β‐diversity maintains regional diversity in Brazilian tropical coastal stream fish assemblages

Abstract: Understanding spatial patterns of species diversity and the variables that structure biological communities is critical to successful ecosystem management. Regional diversity (γ) can be considered a combination of local diversity (α) and among sites variation (β). Using abundance data of fish species in 19 stream stretches, an analysis of diversity partitioning was used to determine the contribution of α‐ and β‐diversity to γ‐diversity. Redundancy analysis was applied to find the contribution of environmental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of pure local‐scale features was always higher than pure catchment‐scale features (including landscape dynamics indicators). In tropical systems, pure local environmental variables explained the variation in fish β‐diversity (Genner et al., ; Teshima, Mello, Ferreira, & Cetra, ) and the same outcome has been also described for tropical plants β‐diversity (Tuomisto, Ruokolainen, & Yli‐Halla, ). This reasoning probably does not apply for catchment‐scale features in our current agricultural scenario, which had little or no direct influence on the different facets of β‐diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of pure local‐scale features was always higher than pure catchment‐scale features (including landscape dynamics indicators). In tropical systems, pure local environmental variables explained the variation in fish β‐diversity (Genner et al., ; Teshima, Mello, Ferreira, & Cetra, ) and the same outcome has been also described for tropical plants β‐diversity (Tuomisto, Ruokolainen, & Yli‐Halla, ). This reasoning probably does not apply for catchment‐scale features in our current agricultural scenario, which had little or no direct influence on the different facets of β‐diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This result once again supports species-sorting mechanisms as the primary drivers of assemblage structure in aquatic systems (Bini et al, 2014;Heino, The influence of pure local-scale features was always higher than pure catchment-scale features (including landscape dynamics indicators). In tropical systems, pure local environmental variables explained the variation in fish β-diversity (Genner et al, 2004;Teshima, Mello, Ferreira, & Cetra, 2016) and the same outcome has been also described for tropical plants β-diversity (Tuomisto, Ruokolainen, & Yli-Halla, 2003 land-use in the catchment is a better predictor of biodiversity than current land-use in agricultural regions (Harding, Benfield, Bolstad, Helfman, & Jones, 1998;Surasinghe & Baldwin, 2014). It is also possible that this reasoning applies to β-diversity, but it remains to be fully explored.…”
Section: Influence Of Environmental Predictors and Dispersal Processesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Beta diversity was found to be more critical for total diversity (i.e., gamma diversity) than the average local diversity. These findings highlight the importance of streams environmental heterogeneity for maintaining regional fish diversity (Erös 2007, Casatti et al 2009, Teshima et al 2016.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Of this total, 97 species occur in the Ribeira de Iguape River basin. Since 2011, at least six species can be added to this list: Pimelodus multicratifer Ribeiro (Teshima et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintaining fish biodiversity in higher elevation basins will be reflected in rivers and reservoirs further down river basins (Vannote et al, 1980). Regionally, species diversity between streams is more important than local diversity, thereby indicating the conservation importance of multiple streams that make up the upper reaches of watersheds (Teshima et al, 2016). Habitat loss is a primary concern identified for all South American river basins (Barletta et al, 2015).…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%