2018
DOI: 10.1353/csd.2018.0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Impact Practices and Student–Faculty Interactions for Students Across Sexual Orientations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender and sexual orientation serve as potent examples, whereby group work negatively impacts the enjoyment of queer students, and asexual and bisexual students prefer to work alone rather than in groups. These findings echo recent work demonstrating that, in ALP settings involving group work, LGBTQIA students felt an increased sense of these minoritized identities (Garvey and Rankin, 2015a;Cooper and Brownell, 2016;Garvey et al, 2018), and suggest mechanisms that may contribute to the lower retention of sexual and gender variant minorities in STEM (Garvey and Rankin, 2015a;BrckaLorenz et al, 2017;Garvey et al, 2018;Hughes, 2018). We thus question the idea that group work is a pedagogical panacea to the large-lecture problem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gender and sexual orientation serve as potent examples, whereby group work negatively impacts the enjoyment of queer students, and asexual and bisexual students prefer to work alone rather than in groups. These findings echo recent work demonstrating that, in ALP settings involving group work, LGBTQIA students felt an increased sense of these minoritized identities (Garvey and Rankin, 2015a;Cooper and Brownell, 2016;Garvey et al, 2018), and suggest mechanisms that may contribute to the lower retention of sexual and gender variant minorities in STEM (Garvey and Rankin, 2015a;BrckaLorenz et al, 2017;Garvey et al, 2018;Hughes, 2018). We thus question the idea that group work is a pedagogical panacea to the large-lecture problem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…LGBT students exhibit disproportionately high attrition in STEM. Garvey and Rankin, 2015b;Pryor, 2015;Cooper and Brownell, 2016;Garvey et al, 2018;Hughes, 2018 Commuter status Students who live off-campus may feel less included in all aspects of the community, including classroom discourse and group work; commuters may be less open to diversity. Pike, 2002;Jacoby andGarland, 2004 (Kim andSax, 2009a;Aschbacher et al, 2010;Rocca, 2010).…”
Section: Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Vaccaro's [77] research, LGBT students considered supportive faculty members to be the most positive aspect of their undergraduate experience. Meanwhile, Garvey, BrckaLorenz, Latopolski, and Hurtado [78] noted the potential adverse impact of negative interactions with faculty, asserting that LGBQ students may choose to leave the institution if faculty do not create learning environments that are inclusive for students of all sexual orientations. They wrote, "Faculty members have a unique influence on students' classroom perceptions and academic experiences.…”
Section: Learning Experiences and The Role Of Facultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They wrote, "Faculty members have a unique influence on students' classroom perceptions and academic experiences. LGBQ students' experience in the classroom largely governs perceptions of the overall academic experience; therefore, it is critical that scholars examine the relationships between faculty and LGBQ students and the relationship with academic success" [78] (p. 212).…”
Section: Learning Experiences and The Role Of Facultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make this sensibilization effective and reach all university members, it has been shown that the inclusion of LGBT literature in academic curriculums has the highest impact in the reduction of LGBT-phobia (18,26). Another protective factor for the prevention and intervention in cases of violence based in sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression is the explicit institutional support towards the LGBTQI + groups through the implementation of politics and strategies towards the reduction of hetero-sexism (6,9,27,28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%