2010 IEEE Rural Electric Power Conference (REPC) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/repcon.2010.5476205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High impedance fault detection on rural electric distribution systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former measures the sensitivity of the detection criterion developed; it is calculated by recording the success rate in detecting the occurrence of a HIF. The latter measures the security of the detection criterion; it is calculated as the rate of mistakenly categorising other transient events as HIF [32]. They are defined as: Detectionrate=NumberofHIFdetectedTotalnumberofactualHIFevents×100% right leftthickmathspace.5emDiscriminationthickmathspacerate=1NumberthickmathspaceofthickmathspaceotherthickmathspaceeventsthickmathspaceincorrectlythickmathspacediagnosedthickmathspaceasthickmathspaceHIFTotalthickmathspacenumberthickmathspaceofthickmathspaceotherthickmathspaceevents×100% The detection rate was calculated based on 200 sets of HIF data.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former measures the sensitivity of the detection criterion developed; it is calculated by recording the success rate in detecting the occurrence of a HIF. The latter measures the security of the detection criterion; it is calculated as the rate of mistakenly categorising other transient events as HIF [32]. They are defined as: Detectionrate=NumberofHIFdetectedTotalnumberofactualHIFevents×100% right leftthickmathspace.5emDiscriminationthickmathspacerate=1NumberthickmathspaceofthickmathspaceotherthickmathspaceeventsthickmathspaceincorrectlythickmathspacediagnosedthickmathspaceasthickmathspaceHIFTotalthickmathspacenumberthickmathspaceofthickmathspaceotherthickmathspaceevents×100% The detection rate was calculated based on 200 sets of HIF data.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When an electrical conductor unintentionally comes into contact with a highly resistive medium, it creates what is commonly referred to as a high-impedance fault (HIF). HIFs can be classified into two main types: active and passive, the latter of which occurs in underground conductor insulation deuteriation over a period of time [6], and the other occurs when an overhead conductor 2 of 18 breaks and touches highly resistive ground, creating an immediate transient arc [7,8]. The current levels of the resulting phenomena are marginally higher than the normal drawn ampere from the load, hence deeming them impossible to be detected by conventional overcurrent relays [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of high impedance fault detection is generally categorized into mechanical and electrical detection techniques. The mechanical method of detection involves forcing the line to touch down with a solid ground to permit the operation of overcurrent protection (Vico et al, 2010) while the electrical method involves the use of classical or heuristical approaches. The classical approach is made up of wavelet transform, high-frequency spectrum, and low order harmonics while the heuristical method comprises expert system, neural network, neur-fuzzy network, fuzzy logic, and generic algorithm (Sedighizadeh et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%