2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2016.2548942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Impedance Fault Identification on Distribution Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
12

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
87
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…A sift into the past ten years of research can shed light on common correlational features used in modern detection approaches. Among the most popular, wavelet features have been gaining presence and popularity in much of the works [4]- [7]. The detailed coefficients, outputs of the wavelet transformation, are usually used in two main detection approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sift into the past ten years of research can shed light on common correlational features used in modern detection approaches. Among the most popular, wavelet features have been gaining presence and popularity in much of the works [4]- [7]. The detailed coefficients, outputs of the wavelet transformation, are usually used in two main detection approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, all these works, presents the identification and location of conventional fault without considering the HIF. On the other hand, the authors in and present the identification and location of HIF in power system but fail to test the robustness of the classifier for all other conventional faults and switching transients. In this case, the accuracy of identification of HIF in the system lies in the range of 70% to 100% by methods like DWT, Morphological fault detector and combination of WT with other various classifiers namely Fuzzy‐ARTMAP, Boosted decision tree, Finite element method and Extreme learning machine.…”
Section: Comparison With Literature Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In linking with previously published work, though the various intelligence‐based classifier techniques are accurate in detecting the fault but suffers from few limitation such as: increased burden of its computational complexity, required large size training data with proper tuning of weight/membership function, long run time and non‐identical solution in repeated runs that can increases the difficultly level to implement in real time . With the advancement of digital technology and communication networks, a classical digital system‐based deterministic approach is used for monitoring the condition of the system is proposed in this paper . The proffered classifier is a simple Graphical Language (GL) algorithm, developed using LabVIEW interfacing facility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If a discrete signal x ( k ) is transformed by wavelet function, it has high‐frequency component coefficients d j ( k ) and low‐frequency coefficient a j ( k ) at instant k and scale j. The frequency band ranges contained in the signal components D j ( k ) and A j ( k ) obtained by reconstruction are : centerDjk:2j+1fs2jfsAjk:0,2jfs where f s is the sampling frequency, j = 1, 2,…, m . The original signal sequence x ( k ) can be represented by the sum of all components, namely: x()k=D1()k+A1()k=D1()k+D2()k+A2()k=j=1mDj()k+A2()k …”
Section: The Theory Of Wavelet Transforms and Wavelet Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%