2001
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Incidence of Positive Peritoneal Cytology in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer Treated by Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that support this view propose that endometrial carcinoma cells gain access to the peritoneal cavity via the fallopian tubes as a result of positive intrauterine pressure associated with minimally invasive surgical procedures. 87,[90][91][92] Peritoneal washings from minimally invasive hysterectomies were more likely to have malignant cells, as compared to those performed without the uterine manipulator. A study by Hu and Brown 90 showed that 7 of 37 peritoneal washings (20.6%) had malignant cells associated with minimally invasive hysterectomies as compared to 0 of 26 hysterectomies (0%) performed without a uterine manipulator in low-grade and low-stage endometrial carcinomas.…”
Section: Positive Peritoneal Washingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that support this view propose that endometrial carcinoma cells gain access to the peritoneal cavity via the fallopian tubes as a result of positive intrauterine pressure associated with minimally invasive surgical procedures. 87,[90][91][92] Peritoneal washings from minimally invasive hysterectomies were more likely to have malignant cells, as compared to those performed without the uterine manipulator. A study by Hu and Brown 90 showed that 7 of 37 peritoneal washings (20.6%) had malignant cells associated with minimally invasive hysterectomies as compared to 0 of 26 hysterectomies (0%) performed without a uterine manipulator in low-grade and low-stage endometrial carcinomas.…”
Section: Positive Peritoneal Washingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been controversy in the past years as to whether laparoscopic hysterectomies are associated with higher rates of positive peritoneal washings, presumably related to the increased intrauterine pressure from the manipulator causing tumor cells to be propelled through the fallopian tubes into the peritoneal cavity. [4][5][6] As a result, many surgeons now ligate or clamp the tubes and/or obtain peritoneal washings before inserting the manipulator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of an intrauterine manipulator is not necessarily required to perform an adequate laparoscopic-assisted procedure and could prevent the retrograde dissemination of cancer cells into the peritoneal cavity during uterine manipulation. 40 Gamal H Eltabakh et al in a prospective study of laparoscopic surgical staging of clinical stage 1 endometroid endometrial carcinoma using Pelosi uterine manipulator have reported that it does not increase the incidence of positive peritoneal cytology. 41…”
Section: Uterine Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 97%