“…For the case of 1.06 pm light pulses where G is estimated from the intensity Eo (mJ) incident on the sample for a surface reflection of 20 % and an absorption coefficient a = 40 cm -1, we obtain : Since the incident energy used Eo (1.06 pn) varied between -10-4 mJ and I02/mJ, the measurements done at ambient temperature with 1.06 03BCm light correspond to the followin$ range of excess electron or hole densities,' where oiv to high injection rates An, plpo thus appear involved : epitaxial layer w = 0.9 gm epitaxial layer w = 1.3 ym epitaxial layer w = 2.4 g 4.2 ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF TRANSIENT PHOTO-RESPONSE RESULTS. -We recall first that, for the three cases of transient photoresponses that are used in the present work, the responses given by the epitaxial samples must be considered a priori as the sum of two contributions : a primary contribution which agree with a contribution of excess free carriers, and a secondary contribution which appears as a perturbation of the electrical state of the material following the injection of these free carriers, e.g., perturbation of the electronic occupation state nE, pE of energy levels E located in the bandgap, and therefore of the charge carrier density, p( po, Ap, Y nl), y pA), mobility, Jl(Po + An, p), in the material, etc... [4]. where ao is the equilibrium conductivity of the mate-, rial (P-type).…”