2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00501-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-intensity cannabis use and hospitalization: a prospective cohort study of street-involved youth in Vancouver, Canada

Abstract: Background There is concern that cannabis use negatively affects vulnerable groups such as youth; however, the relationship between cannabis use and health care utilization has not been well characterized in this population. We longitudinally evaluated the association between daily cannabis use and hospitalization among a prospective cohort of street-involved youth. Methods Data were collected from the At-Risk Youth Study (ARYS) in Vancouver, Canad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these studies omitted service use variables. However, previous ED visits [ 25 , 29 ] and hospitalizations [ 24 , 29 ] and enrollment in a health insurance program [ 23 ] were often found to increase ED use, whereas receiving more days of psychiatric care [ 26 ] and prior drug treatment [ 27 ] increased hospitalization rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies omitted service use variables. However, previous ED visits [ 25 , 29 ] and hospitalizations [ 24 , 29 ] and enrollment in a health insurance program [ 23 ] were often found to increase ED use, whereas receiving more days of psychiatric care [ 26 ] and prior drug treatment [ 27 ] increased hospitalization rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a detailed assessment of 14,348 papers, a total of 32 studies were included in the present study (Adam et al, 2020; Ayangbayi et al, 2017; Binswanger et al, 2008; Campbell et al, 2017; Cederbaum et al, 2014; Chen et al, 2015; Choi et al, 2016, 2018; Clark et al, 2013; Di Giovanni et al, 2020; Frank et al, 2015; Hansagi et al, 2012; Indig et al, 2010; John & Wu, 2017; Knowlton et al, 2005; Laine et al, 2001; Larson et al, 2006; Manuel & Lee, 2017; McDonald et al, 2011; Mejia de Grubb et al, 2020; Palepu et al, 1999; Parthasarathy & Weisner, 2005; Perron et al, 2011; Reddon et al, 2021; Rockett et al, 2005; Siegal et al, 2006; Stein & Anderson, 2003; Turner et al, 2003; Van Doren et al, 2016; Walley et al, 2012; Wu et al, 2012; Zhang et al, 2021). The main exclusion criteria were studies that did not assess ED use or hospitalization and those that did not assess associated variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eleven studies out of 32 (Adam et al, 2020; Campbell et al, 2017; Cederbaum et al, 2014; Choi et al, 2018; Clark et al, 2013; Frank et al, 2015; Indig et al, 2010; John & Wu, 2017; Parthasarathy & Weisner, 2005; Perron et al, 2011; Turner et al, 2003) and eight studies out of 32 (Campbell et al, 2017; Cederbaum et al, 2014; Choi et al, 2016; Di Giovanni et al, 2020; Laine et al, 2001; Parthasarathy & Weisner, 2005; Reddon et al, 2021; Turner et al, 2003) patients who had MHDs were 1.54 and 1.40 times more likely to report ED use and hospitalization compared to those who did not have MHDs respectively (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.20–1.98) (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.07–1.83). In seven studies out of 32 (Campbell et al, 2017; Cederbaum et al, 2014; Choi et al, 2018; Larson et al, 2006; Parthasarathy & Weisner, 2005; Siegal et al, 2006; Turner et al, 2003) and nine studies out of 32 (Binswanger et al, 2008; Campbell et al, 2017; Cederbaum et al, 2014; Laine et al, 2001; Mejia de Grubb et al, 2020; Parthasarathy & Weisner, 2005; Stein & Anderson, 2003; Turner et al, 2003; Walley et al, 2012) those who had chronic physical illnesses were 1.33 and 1.30 times more likely to have ED use or hospitalization compared to those who did not have chronic physical illnesses, respectively (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.15–1.54) (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.15–1.47) (Figures 6 and 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation