Prostate Cancer - Diagnostic and Therapeutic Advances 2011
DOI: 10.5772/25029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) - An Alternative Choice in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Histology also demonstrated that pre-existing vascular, neural and other normal structures enveloped by the growing neoplasm were unaffected by the therapy (Bunte et al 2006). These post-antivascular therapy findings are quite different to those described after tumor therapy with high intensity focused ultrasound, where power levels of 1,000 to 20,000 W.cm −2 (Briones et al 2008, Van Leenders et al 2000) lead to localized temperature rises of 85–100°C (Maestroni et al 2008). There is instantaneous coagulative necrosis of all tissues in the therapeutic zone (Susani et al 1993; Van Leenders et al 2000) the histologic changes may, however, not be confined to the target structure and involve adjacent normal tissues (Van Leenders et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Histology also demonstrated that pre-existing vascular, neural and other normal structures enveloped by the growing neoplasm were unaffected by the therapy (Bunte et al 2006). These post-antivascular therapy findings are quite different to those described after tumor therapy with high intensity focused ultrasound, where power levels of 1,000 to 20,000 W.cm −2 (Briones et al 2008, Van Leenders et al 2000) lead to localized temperature rises of 85–100°C (Maestroni et al 2008). There is instantaneous coagulative necrosis of all tissues in the therapeutic zone (Susani et al 1993; Van Leenders et al 2000) the histologic changes may, however, not be confined to the target structure and involve adjacent normal tissues (Van Leenders et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Among publications on HIFU as a primary therapy for prostate cancer, 15 studies report series of at least 50 patients [13,16,17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], while the others report on fewer patients [12,[32][33][34].…”
Section: Hifu Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In seven of nine patients with biopsy‐proven localized prostate carcinoma (cT 1‐2 N 0 M 0 ), a vital bilateral tumor was found at the dorsal side of the treated HIFU area . In the other studies of HIFU treatment on prostate cancer, biochemical relapses were observed in 4 of 25 patients; 56% of 71 patients had evidence of prostate cancer progression at the 3‐month follow‐up; the actuarial disease recurrence rates of 140 patients at 5 and 7 yr were 33% and 41%, respectively . One of the reasons for cancer relapse may be the untreated gaps within the planned treatment area .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%