2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41440-019-0392-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-intensity interval training for reducing blood pressure: a randomized trial vs. moderate-intensity continuous training in males with overweight or obesity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
30
1
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
30
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We thank Li and colleagues for their comments regarding our recent research into the benefits of incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) into cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) [ 1 ]. In recent years, HIIT has proven popular in the general community and has been studied across a wide array of cardiovascular (CV)-related disorders, such as hypertension [ 2 , 3 ], stroke [ 4 , 5 ], type II diabetes [ 6 ] and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [ 7 ]. This is due to compounding, compelling evidence of the efficacy of HIIT on CV outcomes such as reduced blood pressure, lowered body fat, improved lipid profile, less arterial stiffness, improved myocardial function (lower rate pressure product), and improved insulin resistance/glucose control [ [8] , [9] , [10] ], in addition to the cardiac-specific adaptations that Li and colleagues outlined in their letter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank Li and colleagues for their comments regarding our recent research into the benefits of incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) into cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) [ 1 ]. In recent years, HIIT has proven popular in the general community and has been studied across a wide array of cardiovascular (CV)-related disorders, such as hypertension [ 2 , 3 ], stroke [ 4 , 5 ], type II diabetes [ 6 ] and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [ 7 ]. This is due to compounding, compelling evidence of the efficacy of HIIT on CV outcomes such as reduced blood pressure, lowered body fat, improved lipid profile, less arterial stiffness, improved myocardial function (lower rate pressure product), and improved insulin resistance/glucose control [ [8] , [9] , [10] ], in addition to the cardiac-specific adaptations that Li and colleagues outlined in their letter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that aerobic exercise training decreases Central Systolic BP (cSBP) [6]. Interestingly, anaerobic exercise training (i.e., high-intensity interval training) has a more effective central BP-lowering effect than moderate continuous exercise training, a general aerobic exercise training [7,8]. In contrast to the beneficial effects of anaerobic exercise, cSBP and Central Pulse Pressure (cPP) in resistance-trained athletes are higher than in sedentary controls [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exercise intensity is the percentage of a person can cope with the load in a certain time (Buzzichelli, 2019), with an intensity division of less than 50% low, 50% -70% medium, 70% -80% medium weight, 80% -90% weight, 90% -100%, maximum and above 100 supermaximal (Buzzichelli, 2019). The recommended exercise to achieve good results in recent times is of high intensity, review evidence shows moderate and high intensity exercise are more effective against cardiac systole (Clark et al, 2020), reduced risk of complications in obesity (Koh, Park, & Carter, 2018), fitness, obesity and cardiorespiratory (Hay et al, 2016) and increased VO2max (Zouhal et al, 2020), then there is an influence on people in relation to body image, to improve body composition (Wewege, van den Berg, Ward, & Keech, 2017;Álvarez et al, 2018), those who are overweight can be treated with high intensity (de Lira et al, 2017), insulin performance body fat composition (Zhang et al, 2017;Türk et al, 2017), keep the heart in shape (Chuensiri, Suksom, & Tanaka, 2018;Türk et al, 2017;Dias et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%