2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12944-020-01369-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-intensity statin therapy yields better outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients: a meta-analysis involving 26,497 patients

Abstract: Background Whether high-intensity statin treatment provides more clinical benefits compared with standard statin regimens in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to comparatively assess high-intensity and standard statin regimens for efficacy and safety in patients with ACS. Methods The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies assessing high-intensity vs. standard statin regimens for ACS t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings are also in line with recent studies in the cardiovascular literature, which support the early benefit of statins in cardiovascular disease. 24,25 Our findings support additional benefits of statins beyond the plaque stabilizing function and further support the use of statins regardless of LDL level. 26 Exploring the reasons for no statin use and deintensification is the next step in understanding whether and why these prescribing practices may be harmful.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings are also in line with recent studies in the cardiovascular literature, which support the early benefit of statins in cardiovascular disease. 24,25 Our findings support additional benefits of statins beyond the plaque stabilizing function and further support the use of statins regardless of LDL level. 26 Exploring the reasons for no statin use and deintensification is the next step in understanding whether and why these prescribing practices may be harmful.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The findings are also in line with recent studies in the cardiovascular literature, which support the early benefit of statins in cardiovascular disease. 24,25 Our findings support additional benefits of statins beyond the plaque stabilizing function and further support the use of statins regardless of LDL level. 26…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In a meta-analysis involving 26497 patients (including 16 randomized controlled trials), which assess high-intensity and standard statin regimens for efficacy and safety in patients with ACS, high-intensity statin therapy resulted in more clinical benefits regarding MACE compared with standard statin treatment in both Asian (RR = 0.77; 95%CI, 0.61-0.98; P = 0.03) and non-Asian (RR = 0.79; 95%CI, 0.71-0.89; P < 0.0001) patients. 37 The fact that a sufficient number of cases failed to reach the target LDL levels in the long term may be due to treatment non-compliance or treatment inadequacy after discharge, which can be shown as a reason for not detecting a statistical relationship with mortality.…”
Section: Discussion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atorvastatin 40-80 mg and rosuvastatin 20-40 mg are statin therapy with high-intensity effects [11]. Simvastatin 20 mg/day with moderate intensity effects may provide better benefits to ischemic stroke patients than high-intensity statins, including lower risk of major adverse cardiac events, lower recurrent ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, as well as a lower risk of experiencing recurrent hospitalizations for cardiovascular disease [13,27,28].…”
Section: Simvastatin Dosagementioning
confidence: 99%