2017
DOI: 10.1002/osp4.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High intensity training in obesity: a Meta-analysis

Abstract: SummaryIntroductionHigh Intensity training (HIT) is a time‐effective alternative to traditional exercise programs in adults with obesity, but the superiority in terms of improving cardiopulmonary fitness and weight loss has not been demonstrated.Objectiveto determine the effectiveness of HIT on cardiopulmonary fitness and body composition in adults with obesity compared to traditional (high volume continuous) exercise.MethodsA systematic search of the main health science databases was conducted for randomized … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
70
1
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
18
70
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the analysis of the effectiveness of HIIT for changes in body composition, an objective of many investigations has been to compare the effectiveness of the HIIT and MICT methods and to identify the best strategy (15,17,(19)(20)(21)28,29,38,44,51,53,(58)(59)(60)64,(66)(67)(68)74). In this present study, the analyses showed that HIIT is similar to MICT for reducing body fat percentage, opposing the findings of the meta-analysis by Türk et al (26) that revealed the superiority of HIIT (À2.01% [95% CI: À3.75% to À0.30%]) in adults with obesity. However, it is worth noting that the mentioned study disregarded the equalization of the energy expenditure or workload between HIIT and MICT, a fact that indisputably creates a bias in the interpretation of results (30).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the analysis of the effectiveness of HIIT for changes in body composition, an objective of many investigations has been to compare the effectiveness of the HIIT and MICT methods and to identify the best strategy (15,17,(19)(20)(21)28,29,38,44,51,53,(58)(59)(60)64,(66)(67)(68)74). In this present study, the analyses showed that HIIT is similar to MICT for reducing body fat percentage, opposing the findings of the meta-analysis by Türk et al (26) that revealed the superiority of HIIT (À2.01% [95% CI: À3.75% to À0.30%]) in adults with obesity. However, it is worth noting that the mentioned study disregarded the equalization of the energy expenditure or workload between HIIT and MICT, a fact that indisputably creates a bias in the interpretation of results (30).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In this present study, the analyses showed that HIIT is similar to MICT for reducing body fat percentage, opposing the findings of the meta‐analysis by Türk et al . that revealed the superiority of HIIT (−2.01% [95% CI: −3.75% to −0.30%]) in adults with obesity. However, it is worth noting that the mentioned study disregarded the equalization of the energy expenditure or workload between HIIT and MICT, a fact that indisputably creates a bias in the interpretation of results .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations