2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01594.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Intraepithelial Eosinophil Counts in Esophageal Squamous Epithelium Are Not Specific for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Adults

Abstract: All histologic features presently ascribed to IEE can occur in other esophageal diseases, notably GERD. As such, the finding of intraepithelial eosinophilia in any number is not specific for IEE. When a patient with GERD has an esophageal biopsy with an eosinophil count >20/hpf, it does not mean that the patient has IEE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
130
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
130
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…4 However, newer data suggest that the differentiation between GERD and allergic mediated OEI cannot be made on density of eosinophilic infiltrate alone, 5 especially when a cut-off of ‡15 eos ⁄ hpf is used. 6,7 The distinction between GERD or allergy-induced OEI has become so important that the most recent consensus statements 4,8 on the diagnostic criteria of eosinophilic oesophagitis requires that GERD be ruled out either by a lack of symptomatic and histological response to acid suppression or a negative pH study. Despite the important endorsement of pH monitoring in these patients, there is little data prospectively evaluating the ability of a positive or negative ambulatory pH study to predict reliable response to either acid suppressing or steroid therapy respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 However, newer data suggest that the differentiation between GERD and allergic mediated OEI cannot be made on density of eosinophilic infiltrate alone, 5 especially when a cut-off of ‡15 eos ⁄ hpf is used. 6,7 The distinction between GERD or allergy-induced OEI has become so important that the most recent consensus statements 4,8 on the diagnostic criteria of eosinophilic oesophagitis requires that GERD be ruled out either by a lack of symptomatic and histological response to acid suppression or a negative pH study. Despite the important endorsement of pH monitoring in these patients, there is little data prospectively evaluating the ability of a positive or negative ambulatory pH study to predict reliable response to either acid suppressing or steroid therapy respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies, we believed the likely proportion would be approximately 50%. 7,12,13 We determined that a sample size of 50 patients would provide a 95% confidence interval of 36-64%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with dysphagia, esophageal biopsies are generally recommended in order to rule out eosinophilic esophagitis. However, it is not uncommon to find an increased number of eosinophils in patients with achalasia secondary to inflammatory process related to stasis (20,21). More than that, motility disorders may be found in up to 25% patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, ineffective esophageal motility being the most common finding (22).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Reactive atypia' was considered when a squamous epithelial cell had a vesicular nucleus and a prominent nucleolus. The thickening of basal layer was rated as normal: < 25% of total epithelial thickness, mild thickening: 25~50%, and marked: >50% [15][16][17]28].…”
Section: Histomorphological Evaluation and Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflux esophagitis and eosinophilic esophagitis are the more well-recognized disease entities involving intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration [14][15][16][17]. Additionally, esophageal ulceration is commonly observed in pill-induced and reflux esophagitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%