2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High level estradiol impairs and low level estradiol facilitates non-spatial working memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, earlier studies used either supraphysiological doses of E 2 (ϳ500 pg/ml) (60) or longer E 2 exposure time (21 days) (3). It should be noted that the physiological effects of E 2 are particularly sensitive to specific experimental paradigms (2,11,23,39,53,61), and it is very likely that the discrepancy among these studies arises from differences in steroid dosage and exposure time. Importantly, despite the fact that E 2 effects can be sensitive to the replacement protocol, the present work shows consistent HPA axis effects using two different E 2 replacement methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, earlier studies used either supraphysiological doses of E 2 (ϳ500 pg/ml) (60) or longer E 2 exposure time (21 days) (3). It should be noted that the physiological effects of E 2 are particularly sensitive to specific experimental paradigms (2,11,23,39,53,61), and it is very likely that the discrepancy among these studies arises from differences in steroid dosage and exposure time. Importantly, despite the fact that E 2 effects can be sensitive to the replacement protocol, the present work shows consistent HPA axis effects using two different E 2 replacement methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low physiological levels of estradiol facilitate whereas high physiological levels of estradiol impair performance on a nonspatial delayed alternation T-maze (653), a task mediated by the prefrontal cortex and not the hippocampus. There is a delaydependent effect, such that high levels of estradiol impair prefrontal cortex-dependent working memory at longer delays and low levels weakly facilitate prefrontal cortex-dependent working memory at a shorter delay (653). Proestrous levels of estradiol impair performance in the differential reinforcement of low rates of responding task, which assesses prefrontal cortex-mediated response inhibition (641).…”
Section: Estrogens and Prefrontal Cortex-dependent Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, systemic E 2 given acutely or chronically improves spatial working memory in the radial arm maze, the Morris water maze, and alternation or delayed nonmatch to position tasks in the T-maze (O'Neal et al 1996;Daniel et al 1997;Fader et al 1998Fader et al , 1999Luine et al 1998;Bimonte and Denenberg 1999;Gibbs 1999;Daniel and Dohanich 2001;Williams 2001, 2004;Bowman et al 2002;Heikkinen et al 2002;Holmes et al 2002;Garza-Meilandt et al 2006;Bohacek and Daniel 2007;Hammond et al 2009). Nonspatial working memory in the T-maze is also improved by systemic E 2 (Wide et al 2004), as is spatial reference memory in the radial arm and Morris water mazes (Packard and Teather 1997a;Heikkinen et al 2002;Gresack and Frick 2006), recognition memory for the location and identity of objects (Vaucher et al 2002;Luine et al 2003;Walf et al 2006;Frye et al 2007;Fernandez et al 2008;Inagaki et al 2010;Zhao et al 2010;Phan et al 2012;Boulware et al 2013), social recognition memory , inhibitory avoidance (Singh et al 1994;Frye andRhodes 2002, but see Foster et al 2003), and trace eyeblink conditioning (Leuner et al 2004). However, not all studies find that E 2 benefits memory in adult females under all conditions, as improvements often depend on methodological variables such as dose (Packard and Teather 1997a;Holmes et al 2002;Leuner et al 2004;…”
Section: Effects Of Exogenous E 2 On Memory In Femalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonspatial working memory in the T-maze is also improved by systemic E 2 (Wide et al 2004), as is spatial reference memory in the radial arm and Morris water mazes (Packard and Teather 1997a;Heikkinen et al 2002;Gresack and Frick 2006), recognition memory for the location and identity of objects (Vaucher et al 2002;Luine et al 2003;Walf et al 2006;Frye et al 2007;Fernandez et al 2008;Inagaki et al 2010;Zhao et al 2010;Phan et al 2012;Boulware et al 2013), social recognition memory , inhibitory avoidance (Singh et al 1994;Frye andRhodes 2002, but see Foster et al 2003), and trace eyeblink conditioning (Leuner et al 2004). However, not all studies find that E 2 benefits memory in adult females under all conditions, as improvements often depend on methodological variables such as dose (Packard and Teather 1997a;Holmes et al 2002;Leuner et al 2004;Wide et al 2004;Gresack and Frick 2006;Foster 2012;Phan et al 2012), age at treatment (Savonenko and Markowska 2003;Gresack et al 2007;Markham and Juraska 2007), duration of treatment (Luine et al 1998;Markowska and Savonenko 2002) (Bohacek and Daniel 2007), the cognitive demands of the task (Bimonte and Denenberg 1999), and duration of ovariectomy prior to treatment (Gibbs 2000;Daniel et al 2006;Vedder et al 2014). Understanding the extent to which these variables influence the response to E 2 has potential translati...…”
Section: Effects Of Exogenous E 2 On Memory In Femalesmentioning
confidence: 99%