2008 10th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icarcv.2008.4795574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High level sensor data fusion for automotive applications using occupancy grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This architecture has been used in the european project PReVENT-ProFusion2 in cooperation with Daimler [1] and also with Volvo Truck [5] (not presented here). It has been also used with CMU demonstrator [2], and is currently used in the european project intersafe2 [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This architecture has been used in the european project PReVENT-ProFusion2 in cooperation with Daimler [1] and also with Volvo Truck [5] (not presented here). It has been also used with CMU demonstrator [2], and is currently used in the european project intersafe2 [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three regions are clearly visible in Fig 3.12, which shows an exemplary inverse sensor model of a 2D range sensor based on [77,86,269]. In front of the obstacle, the inverse sensor model is described by a linear, rising function, which stays below an occupancy value of 0.5.…”
Section: Inverse Sensor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…learning [247], derived analytically from the forward sensor model in special cases [77,145], or specified manually directly [86,269]. For 2D range sensors, it is commonly assumed that the sensor outputs a noisy range and angle measurement of a detected obstacle.…”
Section: Inverse Sensor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this project was to design and develop generic architectures to perform perception tasks (i.e., mapping of the environment, localization of the vehicle in the map, and detection and tracking of moving objects). In this context, our architecture has been integrated and tested on two demonstrators: a Daimler-Mercedes demonstrator [25] and a Volvo Truck demonstrator [10]. The main difference between these 2 demonstrators is the level of abstraction of data provided by the different sensors on each demonstrator: raw data for the Daimler-Mercedes demonstrator (i.e., low level of abstraction) and preprocessed data for the Volvo Truck demonstrator (i.e., high level of abstraction).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%