2023
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.05207-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Levels of Detection of Nonpneumococcal Species of Streptococcus in Saliva from Adults in the United States

Abstract: Testing saliva samples with quantitative PCR (qPCR) improves the sensitivity of detection of pneumococcal carriage. The qPCR assay targeting lytA , the gene encoding the major pneumococcal autolysin, has become widely accepted for the identification of pneumococcus and is even considered the “gold standard” by many.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was also observed when testing samples for SP2020 (Supplementary Figure 2). However, concordance between lytA and SP2020 was weaker, with high rates of samples positive for only one of these targets, indicating a reduced specificity of both the lytA 31 and SP2020 qPCR assays (Supplementary Figure 3) and as such, supported our reasoning to rely solely on piaB for determining sample positivity for pneumococcus. As expected for these carriers without pneumonia, none of the urine samples collected tested positive for pneumococcal antigens using either the UAD or the BinaxNOW® test.…”
Section: Population Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was also observed when testing samples for SP2020 (Supplementary Figure 2). However, concordance between lytA and SP2020 was weaker, with high rates of samples positive for only one of these targets, indicating a reduced specificity of both the lytA 31 and SP2020 qPCR assays (Supplementary Figure 3) and as such, supported our reasoning to rely solely on piaB for determining sample positivity for pneumococcus. As expected for these carriers without pneumonia, none of the urine samples collected tested positive for pneumococcal antigens using either the UAD or the BinaxNOW® test.…”
Section: Population Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, we observed a high prevalence of non-pneumococcal Streptococci in our samples as evident through high rates of positivity in the lytA qPCR assay (see Supplementary Figure 2), while negative for piaB. 31 These Streptococci can have capsules that are identical to pneumococcal capsules in their structure, and whose capsular biosynthesis genes are nearly identical to pneumococcal genes. 44 Therefore, all qPCR assays were tested on a set of samples that were lytA positive and piaB negative (indicating presence of Streptococcus spp., but not pneumococcus) to determine the background rate of detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…30,32 Therefore, to evaluate our sample processing methods for their impact on pneumococcal carriage detection and to exclude confounding from other streptococci, we limited our analyses to piaB. 19,30 Nonetheless, results obtained here, when testing the culture-enriched saliva samples using piaB, highly correlated with results obtained when targeting the lytA gene in the same culture-enriched saliva samples (see Supplementary Figure 2). However, a multiplex PCR assay of the key targets used for pneumococcal carriage detection could be further evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Oral samples have emerged as a promising sample type for the surveillance of respiratory pathogens. 30 For the detection of pneumococcus, the recommended approach for polymicrobial samples such as saliva, is to culture-enrich samples, preferably on blood agar plates supplemented with gentamicin and perform a qPCR on DNA extracted from the culture-enriched samples. 14 Deviating from this recommended approach could impact the sensitivity of detection, as culture-enrichment increases the pneumococcal load in the sample and the DNA extraction processes concentrates the DNA through its elution into a smaller volume compared to the input volume of saliva.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation