2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Lung Allocation Scores and Lung Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prioritizing patients on the waiting list based on the calculated net-transplant benefit has indeed resulted in a significant decrease in the waiting time on the LTx list, along with a shift in the most common indication for LTx to become pulmonary fibrosis instead of obstructive lung disease. [2][3][4]9 The latter finding was evident in our cohort as well as the international experience. 6,10,11 Expectantly, recipients with higher LAS are sicker, older with multiple comorbidities, and increasingly bridged on mechanical ventilation or ECMO.…”
Section: Evolution In Recipient Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prioritizing patients on the waiting list based on the calculated net-transplant benefit has indeed resulted in a significant decrease in the waiting time on the LTx list, along with a shift in the most common indication for LTx to become pulmonary fibrosis instead of obstructive lung disease. [2][3][4]9 The latter finding was evident in our cohort as well as the international experience. 6,10,11 Expectantly, recipients with higher LAS are sicker, older with multiple comorbidities, and increasingly bridged on mechanical ventilation or ECMO.…”
Section: Evolution In Recipient Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…2 Indeed, implementation of the LAS has resulted in a decrease in waiting list mortality, yet impact on short-and long-term clinical outcomes is to be further characterized. [2][3][4][5] Clinically, we have been observing changes in the recipient characteristics with the LAS prioritizing sicker patients with older age, associated comorbidities, on mechanical ventilation, and bridged on mechanical circulatory support. In this study, we examined the accumulative experience of LTx over 30 y at our center, divided into 3 different eras following recent report design from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lung allocation score was implemented the United States in the year of 2005 and the idea behind it was to better understand the mortality between patients who are on the transplant waiting list and patient who survived posttransplant (14).…”
Section: Lung Transplant and Hepatitis Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LAS is calculated on the basis of clinical data collected for each patient, including information such as functional status, exercise capacity, lung function, hemodynamic data, and the need for oxygen or ventilatory support [ 10 ]. If spirometry results are not available or updated in the prior 6 months, the lung function parameters included in LAS calculation will default to normal and the result will be a lower overall LAS score which may underestimate the disease severity and decrease the chance of timely transplantation [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%