2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2017.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High macrophage PD-L1 expression not responsible for T cell suppression

Abstract: Tumors are often comprised of microenvironments (TMEs) with a high proportion of cells and molecules that regulate immunity. Peritoneal cavity (PerC) cell culture reproduces key features of TMEs as lymphocyte proliferation is suppressed by PerC macrophages (Mϕs). We monitored the expression of T cell stimulatory (Class II MHC, B7) and inhibitory (PD-L1) molecules by PerC APCs before and after culture and report here that IFNγ-driven PD-L1 expression increased markedly on PerC Mϕs after TCR ligation, even more … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding sets PD-L1-dependent allograft tolerance apart from some models of tumor-related immunosuppression, where direct signaling through PD-1 leads to downregulation of the T cell responses (41). However, our data support other models where PD-L1 expression correlates with, but does not directly contribute to, the downregulation of T cell function through PD-1 engagement (42). Thus, our data extend the notion that the role of PD-L1 in immune suppression must be APC and context dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This finding sets PD-L1-dependent allograft tolerance apart from some models of tumor-related immunosuppression, where direct signaling through PD-1 leads to downregulation of the T cell responses (41). However, our data support other models where PD-L1 expression correlates with, but does not directly contribute to, the downregulation of T cell function through PD-1 engagement (42). Thus, our data extend the notion that the role of PD-L1 in immune suppression must be APC and context dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…These results were corroborated by our expression analysis of immune markers using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data ( Figure 6D ), which found PDCD1 (PD-1) expression, a co-inhibitory checkpoint protein expressed by activated CD8 + T cells ( Simon and Labarriere, 2018 ), to be higher (p < 0.05) in later-onset HNSC, which also showed suggestively elevated CD8 + T cells ( Figure 6B ). Our immune marker analysis also found CD274 (PD-L1) expression, strongly associated with tumor macrophages ( Goldman et al, 2018 ), to be elevated in later-onset SARC ( Figure 6D ). For young adult cases, several immune checkpoint genes showed trends of elevated (albeit not significant) expression in KIRP (which had significantly higher dendritic cell fractions), suggesting these tumors may be suitable for treatments using immune checkpoint inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…A subset demonstrate occasional programmed cell death ligand 1-positive tumor-associated macrophages, however the therapeutic implications of programmed cell death ligand 1-positive macrophages remains unclear. Some literature suggests that they may play an immunosuppressive role and therefore imply potential benefit from anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 immunotherapy,28 but other work has shown no association with T cell suppression 29…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%