2013
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.095554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High metabolic and water-loss rates in caterpillar aggregations: evidence against the resource-conservation hypothesis

Abstract: ·CO2 ratio) showed a marked increase in grouped caterpillars, particularly in larger groups. Other benefits of aggregation (e.g. reduced predation or increased growth rates) likely outweigh these potential costs, because individuals of E. capensis aggregate voluntarily despite no obvious energetic or hygric advantage, and other potentially confounding group effects (e.g. increased thermoregulatory advantage or whole-animal activity) are inconsequential. The results of this study provide an important exception … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, hypometric mass-scaling of metabolism may be determined by variation in demand for ATP [28][29][30] caused by size-based selection for the performance of specific behaviours affecting metabolism [31][32][33][34][35], or from a mixture of mechanisms that vary across species [23,35]. These alternatives present different and often competing theoretical views of allometric scaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, hypometric mass-scaling of metabolism may be determined by variation in demand for ATP [28][29][30] caused by size-based selection for the performance of specific behaviours affecting metabolism [31][32][33][34][35], or from a mixture of mechanisms that vary across species [23,35]. These alternatives present different and often competing theoretical views of allometric scaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, homeothermic, cold-exposed groups may be a special case because the surface area : volume ratio directly affects the balance of heat loss to heat production; it is difficult to expand such considerations to social groups such as ant colonies that do not endothermically thermoregulate. Among non-social and ectothermic insects, changing group size does not affect the metabolic rate of aggregating caterpillars [28,65]. Experimental tests of size effects have also been conducted by manipulating the size of modular colonial marine organisms [1,31,33,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of a group effect with regard to water loss in C. mesochoreus is different from the enhanced water conservation attributes of grouping behavior in nematodes (Wharton 1996) and also hairworms (Yoder et al 2014). Not all invertebrates retain water more effectively by forming aggregations through group effects: none was observed in caterpillars (Schoombie et al 2013). Our results on C. mesochoreus extend Schoombie et al's (2013) trend to include a branchiobdellidan and a physiological correlation that links lack of a resource-conservation group effect with extremely high rates of water loss by the organism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Not all invertebrates retain water more effectively by forming aggregations through group effects: none was observed in caterpillars (Schoombie et al 2013). Our results on C. mesochoreus extend Schoombie et al's (2013) trend to include a branchiobdellidan and a physiological correlation that links lack of a resource-conservation group effect with extremely high rates of water loss by the organism. Aggregation itself could be beneficial for reasons other than maintaining water balance, such as sex, access to graze on benthic substrate and avoidance of removal from host grooming (Brown et al 2002;Gelder and Williams 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregation, whether social or not, is most likely a mechanism for body water conservation in many invertebrate groups. Examples of this phenomenon are found in Mollusca (Cook, ; Chapman & Underwood, ; Rojas et al , ); Tardigrada (Ivarsson & Jönsson, ); Acari (Glass et al , ; Benoit et al , ); Insecta, as in fly maggots (Rivers et al , ), caterpillars (Klok & Chown, , Schoombie et al , ), beetles (Yoder et al , ; Rasa, ; Yoder & Smith, ; Benoit et al , ), crickets (Yoder et al , ) and cockroaches (Yoder & Grojean, ; Dambach & Goehlen, ); and in certain semiterrestrial crabs (Yoder et al , ). However, few of these studies have investigated the relationship between water losses and the size of the groups thoroughly; special attention has only been directed at small groups and at low density values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%