2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.02.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High metastatic node number, not extracapsular spread or N-classification is a node-related prognosticator in transorally-resected, neck-dissected p16-positive oropharynx cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
119
2
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
119
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In multiple cohorts, smoking and TNM status were reported to effect OS (8, 25, 29, 31), which is in contrast to our findings as we found alcohol, but not smoking, had a significant impact on the outcome of OPSCC patients. In our model, smoking might be canceled out due to the high rate of smokers in the HPV-negative group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In multiple cohorts, smoking and TNM status were reported to effect OS (8, 25, 29, 31), which is in contrast to our findings as we found alcohol, but not smoking, had a significant impact on the outcome of OPSCC patients. In our model, smoking might be canceled out due to the high rate of smokers in the HPV-negative group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…When using clinical staging system on a primarily surgically treated cohort overlap of OS between stages was seen (26). Therefore, classification of N-status was adapted according to number of infiltrated lymph nodes, whereas ECS had no prognostic influence in OS in patients with HPV-associated carcinoma (29). When using those new pathological staging rules, a significant differentiation ( p  < 0.001) between stages I vs. II and II vs. III (5-year OS: I 90%, II 84%, III 48%) were seen (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Adjuvant therapy to the neck should be determined in a multidisciplinary fashion based on the characteristics of both the open biopsy (extracapsular extension, size and number of neck metastases, report of tumor spillage) and the completion neck dissection (additional positive lymph nodes, extracapsular extension, tumor deposits within the prior scar). 13,14,28 These data leave several questions unanswered. First, given the small sample size, a difference in DFS of at least 20% between biopsy and control groups would be necessary to detect a statistically significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,53,[61][62][63][64] For example, a study of 220 patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer who received surgical resection with or without adjuvant treatment showed that the presence of ≥5 metastatic nodes is associated with disease recurrence and survival, but extracapsular spread was not significantly associated with outcomes in this sample. 63 Recent studies of patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer treated with surgery show that soft tissue metastasis may be associated with poor survival outcomes, especially in patients with T3-T4 disease. 53,65 These results suggest that patients with p16-positive disease with extracapsular spread could potentially be treated differently than those with p16-negative disease and extracapsular spread.…”
Section: Hpv and Treatment Of Oropharyngeal Cancermentioning
confidence: 95%