2008
DOI: 10.2118/97671-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Mobility-Ratio Waterflood Performance Prediction: Challenges and New Insights

Abstract: This paper presents the results of a comprehensive study to improve our understanding of high-mobility-ratio waterfloods (HMRWFs) and to improve performance prediction. Published data on heavy-oil water-injection field projects are limited. Several successful HMRWF projects have been reported, and they show significant oil recovery at high water cut. However, the range of reported recovery is large-waterflood (WF) recoveries of approximately 1-or-2% to 20% of original oil in place (OOIP) have been reported for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deionized water (Îœwater = 1 cSt, ρwater = 0.99 g/mL), used as the invading fluid, was injected into the microfluidic device through a side channel using a syringe pump (Chemyx Fusion 100, Stafford, TX, USA). The mobility ratio, defined as the ratio of dynamic viscosities (M = Îœoil ρoil/Îœwater ρwater), is a measure of the ease with which an invading fluid flows in the presence of a defending fluid [45], with lower mobility allowing the invading fluid to flow through the porous media and recover more oil than a mobility is higher.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deionized water (Îœwater = 1 cSt, ρwater = 0.99 g/mL), used as the invading fluid, was injected into the microfluidic device through a side channel using a syringe pump (Chemyx Fusion 100, Stafford, TX, USA). The mobility ratio, defined as the ratio of dynamic viscosities (M = Îœoil ρoil/Îœwater ρwater), is a measure of the ease with which an invading fluid flows in the presence of a defending fluid [45], with lower mobility allowing the invading fluid to flow through the porous media and recover more oil than a mobility is higher.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Darcy's law [45], fluid phase velocity is proportional to phase mobility. The mobility ratio (M) is generally defined as the mobility of the displacing phase (gas in the gas/aqueous case) divided by that of the displaced phase, which is the formation brine in this study [45][46][47][48],…”
Section: Partitioning With Two Impuritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For certain displacing and displaced fluids, the mobility ratio has an influence on the degree of flow instability in the displacing process [47]. If M >1, it indicates that the flowing capacity of the displacing phase is stronger than that of the displaced phase.…”
Section: Partitioning With Two Impuritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this standpoint it would seem that polymer flooding has been primarily designed to improve the mobility ratio, M, i.e. the ratio between the mobility of the displacing and displaced fluid phases (Chang, 1978;Gogarty, 1967;Kumar et al, 2008;Lake, 1987;Pye, 1964) because, as it well known, if M is greater than unity the displacing front becomes unstable (i.e., unfavorable mobility ratio); conversely, a value equal to or less than unity is a favorable mobility ratio and, it goes without saying, the target value (Mungan et al, 1966;Ali and Thomas, 1996;Morelato et al, 2011). However, achieving this in the field has proven more challenging than expected because, as it is known, in many EOR processes there will be more than one displacement front; for example, if multiple slugs of different fluids are injected, the flow behavior of any specific displacement front will be affected not only by the mobilities of the fluids immediately ahead of and behind that front, but also by the mobilities of fluids in regions around the other fronts (Green and Willhite, 1998).…”
Section: A Concise Account Of Polymer-based Treatments Since the 1960smentioning
confidence: 99%