2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2005.04907
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Multiplicity Fair Allocation Using Parametric Integer Linear Programming

Abstract: Using insights from parametric integer linear programming, we significantly improve on our previous work [Proc. ACM EC 2019] on high-multiplicity fair allocation. Therein, answering an open question from previous work, we proved that the problem of finding envyfree Pareto-efficient allocations of indivisible items is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the combined parameter "number of agents" plus "number of item types." Our central improvement, compared to this result, is to break the condition that th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Bredereck et al 2020) authors show (theoretical) fixed-parameter tractability results for finding envy-free and…”
Section: Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (Bredereck et al 2020) authors show (theoretical) fixed-parameter tractability results for finding envy-free and…”
Section: Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This motivated the study of its relaxations. One of the actual and relevant relaxations of EF proposed by (Caragiannis et al 2016) is called envy-free up to any item (EFx). Each agent's bundle should be worth at least as much as any other agent's bundle minus any single item for the allocation to be EFx.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are training the network for 10 × 20 and 13 × 26. however, we show our test results for various 𝑛 ×𝑚. We test for network performance for 𝑛 ∈ [7,15]. Further, we also train a individual network over different distributions such as Gaussian (𝜇=0.5,𝜎=1), Log-normal (𝜇 = 0.5,𝜎 = 1), and Exponential (𝜆 = 1), with 150𝑘 training samples for 𝑛 = 10.…”
Section: Training Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While finding EF1 or MUW allocations are polynomial-time solvable, maximizing utilitarian welfare within EF1 allocation is an NP-hard problem [2-4, 8, 22] even in additive valuation settings. There is existing work that provides approximate efficiency and fairness guarantees in [1,9,15,35]. But to find allocations that are MUW among EF allocations is an NP-Hard problem even when valuations are additive for two agents [5,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%