2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00607-012-0253-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-order/ $$hp$$ -adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for acoustic problems

Abstract: Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00607-012-0253-5Publisher's copyright statement:The nal publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00607-012-0253-5Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the origin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was concluded from these comparative studies that high-order polynomial methods in combination with static condensation are able to deliver comparable or, in some cases, even superior performance. On the other hand, high order hp-discontinuous Galerkin methods have been demonstrated as competitive discretisation schemes (see, e.g., [43,44] and the references cited therein), due to their flexibility in dealing with hp-adaptivity and general shaped elements, and their ability in achieving the exponential convergence rate of spectral techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded from these comparative studies that high-order polynomial methods in combination with static condensation are able to deliver comparable or, in some cases, even superior performance. On the other hand, high order hp-discontinuous Galerkin methods have been demonstrated as competitive discretisation schemes (see, e.g., [43,44] and the references cited therein), due to their flexibility in dealing with hp-adaptivity and general shaped elements, and their ability in achieving the exponential convergence rate of spectral techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DG methods are inherently local requiring less communication between neighbouring mesh cells. This facilitates the enforcement of local mass conservation (i.e., per mesh cell) , the development of multiscale methods , hp‐adaptivity and parallelization . On the other hand, DG methods yield additional degrees of freedom compared to CG.…”
Section: Introduction and Geophysical Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%