2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2006.01.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-order numerical solution of the nonlinear Helmholtz equation with axial symmetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new computational methodology for the NLH that we present builds up on our previous work [19,2,20,21] and extends it substantially. We introduce a new semi-compact discretization and a new Newton's solver, and the ensuing capabilities include an explicit demonstration of the removal of singularity that "plagues" the NLS, and the computation of narrow nonparaxial solitons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The new computational methodology for the NLH that we present builds up on our previous work [19,2,20,21] and extends it substantially. We introduce a new semi-compact discretization and a new Newton's solver, and the ensuing capabilities include an explicit demonstration of the removal of singularity that "plagues" the NLS, and the computation of narrow nonparaxial solitons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In [19], we have demonstrated that the iterations' convergence in [2,20,21] breaks down far below the power threshold for non-uniqueness of the one-dimensional problem. This suggested that the convergence difficulties in [2,20,21] were not related to the loss of uniqueness by the solution [18,8], but rather to the deficiencies of the iteration scheme itself. The latter may be (partially) accounted for by the known convergence limitations of the Born approximations, because they can be interpreted as a Neumann series [27] for the corresponding integral operator [26,Section 13.1.4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations