2016
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐order resting‐state functional connectivity network for MCI classification

Abstract: Brain functional connectivity (FC) network, estimated with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) technique, has emerged as a promising approach for accurate diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. However, the conventional FC network is essentially low-order in the sense that only the correlations among brain regions (in terms of RS-fMRI time series) are taken into account. The features derived from this type of brain network may fail to serve as an effective disease biomarker. To over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
231
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
9
231
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared our method with three state-of-the-art methods: (RAW) where we directly input the raw connectomic brain features, (t-test) where we perform dimensionality reduction using statistical feature selection, and (LLE) where we perform a local linear embedding of the connectomic features to produce a compact and low-dimensional representation of feature vectors. Our method produced the best ASD/NC classification accuracy when using (CC (HON) + CON) features, which significantly outperformed t-test using (CC(HON) + CON) as in [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We compared our method with three state-of-the-art methods: (RAW) where we directly input the raw connectomic brain features, (t-test) where we perform dimensionality reduction using statistical feature selection, and (LLE) where we perform a local linear embedding of the connectomic features to produce a compact and low-dimensional representation of feature vectors. Our method produced the best ASD/NC classification accuracy when using (CC (HON) + CON) features, which significantly outperformed t-test using (CC(HON) + CON) as in [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…2. Our method produced the best ASD/NC classification accuracy (61.76%) when using (CC(HON) + CON) features, which largely outperformed t-test using (CC(HON) + CON) as in [8].…”
Section: Hj −Hi||2mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, [4] computed sparse temporal networks using sliding-window approach over a time series of restingstate functional MRI. [5] extended this work by additionally considering the high-order correlation between different pairs of brain regions. By combining low-order with high-order correlations, they further improved the classification accuracy of eMCI/NC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%