2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icecs.2011.6122224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High pass filter implementation comparison in unity STF high pass ΔΣ modulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, while the HPF 2 is similar but with the scaled down sampling capacitor and constant biasing. The only difference from the parasitic-insensitive SC integrator is that the integrating capacitors C int1 are alternated around the amplifier at the chopping frequency, f s /2, to produce the high-pass transfer function [8]. The HPF 1 is often the most power consuming block of the whole modulator due to the large capacitive load.…”
Section: B High-pass Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, while the HPF 2 is similar but with the scaled down sampling capacitor and constant biasing. The only difference from the parasitic-insensitive SC integrator is that the integrating capacitors C int1 are alternated around the amplifier at the chopping frequency, f s /2, to produce the high-pass transfer function [8]. The HPF 1 is often the most power consuming block of the whole modulator due to the large capacitive load.…”
Section: B High-pass Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%