2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2015.7363974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance analysis of big spatial data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al (2015) The experiment results show that this approach is 2x faster than the state-of-the-art. Haynes et al (2015) introduces Terra Populus that acts as the bridge between big data sources and researchers. Researchers are provided with convenient web applications that allow them to access, analyze, and tabulate different datasets under a common platform.…”
Section: Analytics and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al (2015) The experiment results show that this approach is 2x faster than the state-of-the-art. Haynes et al (2015) introduces Terra Populus that acts as the bridge between big data sources and researchers. Researchers are provided with convenient web applications that allow them to access, analyze, and tabulate different datasets under a common platform.…”
Section: Analytics and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, most approaches to parallelization are limited in scope or provide extensions to existing frameworks such as MapReduce and column store databases. While this work is very promising, no existing systems are robust or wide-ranging enough for GIScience production environments like TerraPop (Haynes et al 2015). …”
Section: Spatial High-performance Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose this approach based on evidence that parallel relational databases like PostgreSQL can perform significantly better than MapReduce systems (Pavlo et al 2009). Our work to date has significantly improved performance in analyzing vector datasets, offering near linear speedup when adding nodes by sharding spatial queries across a cluster of machines where a PostgreSQL database instance is run on each node for simple topographical operations such as determining whether a polygon intersects a line or other polygon (Haynes et al 2015; Ray et al 2014). This work thereby addresses fundamental research needs in spatial high performance computing (Vo, Aji, and Wang 2014).…”
Section: Spatial High-performance Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PostgreSQL does not natively support parallel queries for analyzing many kinds of big spatial data, and parallelization (essentially breaking a big problem into many small ones handled by separate computing cores) is the primary way in which big data is handled by most computation platforms. In our previous work we extended upon the existing PostgreSQL platform (Haynes, Ray, Manson, & Soni, ; Ray, Simion, Brown, & Johnson, ). Haynes et al () discussed a prototype shared‐nothing parallel spatial database, called SpatialStado.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work we extended upon the existing PostgreSQL platform (Haynes, Ray, Manson, & Soni, ; Ray, Simion, Brown, & Johnson, ). Haynes et al () discussed a prototype shared‐nothing parallel spatial database, called SpatialStado. SpatialStado acts as a coordinating node allowing it to leverage multiple PostgreSQL instances but currently has not implemented the raster data type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%