2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance and antifouling vertically aligned carbon nanotube membrane for water purification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2; the water permeability increased more than twofold compared with that obtained after thermal treatment. This attained water permeability of the CNT wall membrane, which is close to 30,000 LMH bar À 1 , is more than an order of magnitude greater than the highest water permeability reported for CNT membranes (B2,400 LMH bar À 1 ) 11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2; the water permeability increased more than twofold compared with that obtained after thermal treatment. This attained water permeability of the CNT wall membrane, which is close to 30,000 LMH bar À 1 , is more than an order of magnitude greater than the highest water permeability reported for CNT membranes (B2,400 LMH bar À 1 ) 11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…However, the water permeance through CNT membranes [1][2][3] was initially not considerably different from that attainable using a commercial polysulfone (PSf) ultrafiltration (UF) membrane 11 , which is approximately several hundred litres per square metre per hour (LMH bar À 1 ). Only recently has a water permeability of 2,400 LMH bar À 1 been achieved 11 . This permeability is not considerably greater than the permeability that can be attained using non-CNT membranes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of effort had been made to develop practical strategies for the fabrication of composite conductive membranes. To date, two main strategies-blending and surface coating-have been reported for the fabrication of composite conductive membranes [22][23][24][25]. However, for the blending strategy, the conductivity of the resultant membrane was normally limited due to the insulting nature of the non-conductive matrix material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But post-surface treatment could increase the penetration resistance leading to flux decrease. Covalent bonding of hydrophilic groups is another attempt to improve fouling resistant performance [16][17][18][19]. Addition of monofunctional structure (o-Aminobenzoic acid-triethylamine salt) into the ingredient of interfacial polymerization, then coating of cross-linked PEG can improve the flux and antifouling performance of membranes according to Ho's work [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%