2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2015.2389239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Performance and Dynamically Updatable Packet Classification Engine on FPGA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared our design with TCAM [17], FSBV [18] and StrideBV [19] with respect to the average memory requirement per flow in table 1. The BV-based pipelined architecture [8] is unclear for the amount of memory requirement, but usually the BV algorithms can provide high throughput at the cost of low memory efficiency. As can be seen, our design consumed 44.5 bytes per flow, achieving a memory efficiency of 1 byte of memory for each byte of flow.…”
Section: Memory Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared our design with TCAM [17], FSBV [18] and StrideBV [19] with respect to the average memory requirement per flow in table 1. The BV-based pipelined architecture [8] is unclear for the amount of memory requirement, but usually the BV algorithms can provide high throughput at the cost of low memory efficiency. As can be seen, our design consumed 44.5 bytes per flow, achieving a memory efficiency of 1 byte of memory for each byte of flow.…”
Section: Memory Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entry has the label value as the l2 destination and wildcard for other fields. Also the corresponding action of the rule is to send the packet to a specified port on the switch [25]. It is an open source network emu lator that creates a network consists of Switches, Controlle r and Hosts.…”
Section: Deploying Fuzzy Logic Controlled System (Flcs) In Contrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each rule can have one or more fields and their associated value, and an action to be taken if matched. To perform the needed comparison to each packed, FPGA has been successfully used [46], [47], [48]. In [49] we find a comparison between packet classification implementations in FPGA, GPP and GPU, with an impressive advantage to FPGA.…”
Section: Fpga and Network Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%