2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.485351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-performance beam stabilization for next-generation ArF scanner systems

Abstract: With the advent of 193 nm systems processing 300 mm wafers, the production lithography cell is about to undergo a technology shift. The mechanism for delivering the beam from the light source to the illumination system, here referred to as a Beam Delivery Unit (BDU), must change to meet the challenges imposed by this shift. To support these changes, Cymer is developing a BDU that will guarantee a stable beam at the scanner entrance during exposure. The beam stabilization control system has been implemented in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this problem, the average deviation correction method was proposed. 44 The average deviation correction method is based on the assumption that, when the pulsed laser repeats at a high frequency, the deviations between laser pulses are not completely isolated but follow a pattern. In addition, the pulses can be divided into pulse segments (consisting of multiple adjacent pulses) that contain the same number of pulses, and larger offsets only occur between pulse segments.…”
Section: Beam Pointing Deviation Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this problem, the average deviation correction method was proposed. 44 The average deviation correction method is based on the assumption that, when the pulsed laser repeats at a high frequency, the deviations between laser pulses are not completely isolated but follow a pattern. In addition, the pulses can be divided into pulse segments (consisting of multiple adjacent pulses) that contain the same number of pulses, and larger offsets only occur between pulse segments.…”
Section: Beam Pointing Deviation Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the measurement dates of the previous pulse laser can only be used as a criterion for the subsequent pulse adjustment, which is more random and cannot be used to precisely adjust the subsequent pulse by the previous pulse. For this problem, the average deviation correction method was proposed 44 …”
Section: Forward-looking Beam Pointing Correction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, however, the position error of the laser is totally sacrificed. For applications requiring both the position and angular errors, such as fine optical systems [ 8 ] , laser resonator alignment [ 9 ] , laser beam drift control [ 10 ] and lithography [ 11 , 12 ] , the common decoupling method for these two errors involves making two measurements, with one measurement on the in-focus plane and the other on the out-of-focus plane. It can be implemented by repositioning detectors at different locations [ 9 ] , or splitting the beam into two paths [ 10 – 14 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%