Although several in situ techniques, including the Autoclam Permeability System, are available to examine normal concretes (NCs) for this purpose, none are sufficiently sensitive to quantify and distinguish relative high performance concrete (HPC) performance. Therefore, to assess the HPC performance characteristics using the Autoclam air permeability test methodology, two key modifications were investigated and a new test protocol developed. The first modification considered a reduced volume of compressed air applied to the test area (named LV test), and the second an increased test area (named A-75). The reliability of the proposed modifications was investigated by comparing against a laboratory-based gas permeability test method (RILEM air permeability test).Surface resistivity and relative humidity were assessed to evaluate the influence of moisture conditions on in situ air permeability test results. A strong correlation between LV test and RILEM air permeability test results was found when the free moisture near concrete surface regions (up to 20 mm) was removed. It was concluded that the LV test exhibits strong potential to become an established method for assessing in situ HPC permeability.
Key wordsIn situ air permeability test, high performance concrete, relative humidity, surface resistivity, RILEM gas permeability test, Autoclam air permeability test Page-2
IntroductionHigh performance concretes (HPCs) are typically designed with superior performance characteristics relative to normal concretes (NCs) [1][2][3]. Resulting enhanced durability of concrete structures containing HPCs is a key driving force behind their application [2,3]. This is particularly relevantgiven the large sums of money spent annually on repairing and maintaining structures worldwide [4,5]. Various grades of HPCs can be designed, manufactured and tested in laboratory conditions to satisfy design specifications for different service conditions [2,6,7]. However, it is not safe to assume at all times that pre-specified durability levels are achieved on site, as ultimate engineering concrete properties are not solely related to materials, mix proportions and service environments, but also factors which are difficult to control on site, such as manufacturing and delivery processes, as well as construction practices employed from initial placement to final curing [4,8,9]. As a result, a correlation between performance assumptions and in situ construction quality should ideally be considered.To ensure the ultimate delivery of high performance in practice, on site evaluation is essential and so were many field techniques proposed [10][11][12][13][14]. Amongst these, assessment of concrete's near-surface permeation characteristics is recognised as a reliable tool to qualify durability [4,10,14,15], because deterioration of reinforced concrete usually involves ingress of aggressive substances from the surrounding environment [3,5,7,11]. Air permeability tests have gained popularity in recent years due to their short test duration a...